Demographics details for Waipahu, HI vs Flint, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waipahu, HI vs Flint, MI.
| Data | Waipahu | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,873 | 79,854 |
| Median Age | 39.6 years | 36.1 years |
| Median Income | $87,961 | $35,451 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 32% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 10.4 |
Population Comparison: Waipahu vs Flint
- The population in Flint is higher at 79,854, compared to 39,873 in Waipahu.
- Residents in Waipahu have a higher median age of 39.6 years compared to 36.1 years in Flint.
- Waipahu has a higher median income of $87,961 compared to $35,451 in Flint.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Waipahu at 38.0% compared to 20.0% in Flint.
- The poverty level is higher in Flint at 32%, compared to 10% in Waipahu.
- Flint has a higher unemployment rate at 10.4% compared to 4.6% in Waipahu.
Demographics
Demographics Waipahu vs Flint provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Waipahu | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 58 |
| White | 11 | 30 |
| Asian | 67 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Waipahu vs Flint
- In Flint, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 1% in Waipahu.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Flint at 30% compared to 11% in Waipahu.
- The Asian population is larger in Waipahu at 67% compared to 1% in Flint.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Waipahu at 6% compared to 4% in Flint.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Waipahu at 15% compared to 7% in Flint.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waipahu and Flint at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Waipahu | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.7% | 21.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.3% | 17.3% |
| Depression | 10.2% | 25.6% |
| Smoking | 12.9% | 29.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 14.0% |
| Obesity | 22.4% | 51.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waipahu vs Flint
- In Flint, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 12.7% in Waipahu.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Flint at 25.6% versus 10.2% in Waipahu.
- Flint has a higher smoking rate at 29.5% compared to 12.9% in Waipahu.
- Binge drinking is more common in Waipahu at 14.8% compared to 14.0% in Flint.
- Flint has higher obesity rates at 51.7% compared to 22.4% in Waipahu.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Flint at 25.0% compared to 14.0% in Waipahu.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Waipahu | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (729) | 0.8% (629) |
| High School Diploma | 22.1% (8,831) | 20.2% (16,121) |
| Less than High School | 11.0% (4,392) | 15.3% (12,181) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (5,195) | 8.3% (6,616) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waipahu vs Flint
- A higher percentage of residents in Waipahu have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.8% in Flint.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waipahu hold a high school diploma at 22.1% compared to 20.2% in Flint.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Flint at 15.3%, compared to 11.0% in Waipahu.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waipahu hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.0% compared to 8.3% in Flint.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.