Demographics details for Waipahu, HI vs Federalsburg, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waipahu, HI vs Federalsburg, MD.
Data | Waipahu | Federalsburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 39,873 | 2,806 |
Median Age | 39.6 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $87,961 | $33,511 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Waipahu vs Federalsburg
- In Waipahu, the population is higher at 39,873, compared to 2,806 in Federalsburg.
- Residents in Waipahu have a higher median age of 39.6 years compared to 36.4 years in Federalsburg.
- Waipahu has a higher median income of $87,961 compared to $33,511 in Federalsburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Waipahu at 38.0% compared to 32.0% in Federalsburg.
- The poverty level is identical in both Waipahu and Federalsburg at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Waipahu is higher at 4.6%, compared to 4.5% in Federalsburg.
Demographics
Demographics Waipahu vs Federalsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Waipahu | Federalsburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 47 |
White | 11 | 38 |
Asian | 67 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 6 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Waipahu vs Federalsburg
- In Federalsburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 47% compared to 1% in Waipahu.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Federalsburg at 38% compared to 11% in Waipahu.
- The Asian population is larger in Waipahu at 67% compared to 0% in Federalsburg.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Waipahu at 6% compared to 4% in Federalsburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Waipahu at 15% compared to 10% in Federalsburg.
- In Federalsburg, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Waipahu.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Waipahu | Federalsburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.7% | 20.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.3% | 13.9% |
Depression | 10.2% | 23.0% |
Smoking | 12.9% | 22.8% |
Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 12.8% |
Obesity | 22.4% | 47.3% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waipahu vs Federalsburg
- In Federalsburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 12.7% in Waipahu.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Federalsburg at 23.0% versus 10.2% in Waipahu.
- Federalsburg has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 12.9% in Waipahu.
- Binge drinking is more common in Waipahu at 14.8% compared to 12.8% in Federalsburg.
- Federalsburg has higher obesity rates at 47.3% compared to 22.4% in Waipahu.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Federalsburg at 24.0% compared to 14.0% in Waipahu.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Waipahu | Federalsburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (729) | 1.5% (41) |
High School Diploma | 22.1% (8,831) | 24.5% (687) |
Less than High School | 11.0% (4,392) | 22.2% (624) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (5,195) | 4.7% (131) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waipahu vs Federalsburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Waipahu have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.5% in Federalsburg.
- In Federalsburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 22.1% in Waipahu.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Federalsburg at 22.2%, compared to 11.0% in Waipahu.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waipahu hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.0% compared to 4.7% in Federalsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.