Demographics details for Wahpeton, ND vs Clarksville, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wahpeton, ND vs Clarksville, AR.
Data | Wahpeton | Clarksville |
---|---|---|
Population | 8,014 | 9,555 |
Median Age | 34.0 years | 35.3 years |
Median Income | $51,417 | $35,911 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Wahpeton vs Clarksville
- The population in Clarksville is higher at 9,555, compared to 8,014 in Wahpeton.
- The median age in Clarksville is higher at 35.3 years, compared to 34.0 years in Wahpeton.
- Wahpeton has a higher median income of $51,417 compared to $35,911 in Clarksville.
- In Clarksville, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 30.0% in Wahpeton.
- The poverty level is higher in Clarksville at 18%, compared to 11% in Wahpeton.
- Clarksville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Wahpeton.
Demographics
Demographics Wahpeton vs Clarksville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Wahpeton | Clarksville |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 3 |
White | 87 | 60 |
Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
Hispanic | 3 | 23 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
American Indian | 4 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Wahpeton vs Clarksville
- In Clarksville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Wahpeton.
- Wahpeton has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 60% in Clarksville.
- In Clarksville, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Wahpeton.
- Clarksville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 3% in Wahpeton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clarksville at 7%, compared to 4% in Wahpeton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Wahpeton at 4% compared to 1% in Clarksville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Wahpeton | Clarksville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 21.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 16.3% |
Depression | 21.0% | 27.9% |
Smoking | 18.5% | 24.5% |
Binge Drinking | 22.4% | 13.9% |
Obesity | 41.1% | 39.7% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wahpeton vs Clarksville
- In Clarksville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 14.7% in Wahpeton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clarksville at 27.9% versus 21.0% in Wahpeton.
- Clarksville has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 18.5% in Wahpeton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wahpeton at 22.4% compared to 13.9% in Clarksville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wahpeton at 41.1% compared to 39.7% in Clarksville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarksville at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Wahpeton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Wahpeton | Clarksville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (10) | 4.2% (402) |
High School Diploma | 11.1% (886) | 21.6% (2,064) |
Less than High School | 7.7% (621) | 28.6% (2,735) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (1,085) | 8.2% (786) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wahpeton vs Clarksville
- In Clarksville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 0.1% in Wahpeton.
- In Clarksville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 11.1% in Wahpeton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarksville at 28.6%, compared to 7.7% in Wahpeton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wahpeton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.5% compared to 8.2% in Clarksville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.