Demographics details for Wahpeton, ND vs Citrus heights, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Wahpeton, ND vs Citrus heights, CA.

Data Wahpeton Citrus heights
Population 8,014 86,433
Median Age 34.0 years 38.1 years
Median Income $51,417 $75,022
Married Families 30.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 11% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.5

Population Comparison: Wahpeton vs Citrus heights

  • The population in Citrus heights is higher at 86,433, compared to 8,014 in Wahpeton.
  • The median age in Citrus heights is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 34.0 years in Wahpeton.
  • Citrus heights has a higher median income of $75,022, compared to $51,417 in Wahpeton.
  • In Citrus heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 30.0% in Wahpeton.
  • Wahpeton has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Citrus heights.
  • Citrus heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Wahpeton.

Demographics

Demographics Wahpeton vs Citrus heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Wahpeton Citrus heights
Black 2 3
White 87 62
Asian Data is updating 5
Hispanic 3 20
Two or More Races 4 9
American Indian 4 1

Demographics Comparison: Wahpeton vs Citrus heights

  • In Citrus heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Wahpeton.
  • Wahpeton has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 62% in Citrus heights.
  • In Citrus heights, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Wahpeton.
  • Citrus heights has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 3% in Wahpeton.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Citrus heights at 9%, compared to 4% in Wahpeton.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Wahpeton at 4% compared to 1% in Citrus heights.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Wahpeton Citrus heights
Mental Health Not Good 14.7% 17.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 11.3%
Depression 21.0% 21.5%
Smoking 18.5% 14.1%
Binge Drinking 22.4% 17.3%
Obesity 41.1% 32.8%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Wahpeton vs Citrus heights

  • In Citrus heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 14.7% in Wahpeton.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Citrus heights at 21.5% versus 21.0% in Wahpeton.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Wahpeton at 18.5% compared to 14.1% in Citrus heights.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Wahpeton at 22.4% compared to 17.3% in Citrus heights.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Wahpeton at 41.1% compared to 32.8% in Citrus heights.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Citrus heights at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Wahpeton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Wahpeton Citrus heights
No Schooling 0.1% (10) 1.5% (1,266)
High School Diploma 11.1% (886) 15.8% (13,657)
Less than High School 7.7% (621) 12.5% (10,787)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.5% (1,085) 15.8% (13,696)

Education Levels Comparison: Wahpeton vs Citrus heights

  • In Citrus heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.1% in Wahpeton.
  • In Citrus heights, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.8% compared to 11.1% in Wahpeton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Citrus heights at 12.5%, compared to 7.7% in Wahpeton.
  • In Citrus heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.8% compared to 13.5% in Wahpeton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.