Demographics details for Wadesboro, NC vs Soda springs, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Wadesboro, NC vs Soda springs, CA.

Data Wadesboro Soda springs
Population 4,966 54
Median Age 38.3 years 49.0 years
Median Income $32,022 $28,917
Married Families 20.0% Data is updating
Poverty Level Data is updating 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 5.0

Population Comparison: Wadesboro vs Soda springs

  • In Wadesboro, the population is higher at 4,966, compared to 54 in Soda springs.
  • The median age in Soda springs is higher at 49.0 years, compared to 38.3 years in Wadesboro.
  • Wadesboro has a higher median income of $32,022 compared to $28,917 in Soda springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Wadesboro at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Soda springs at 10%, compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Wadesboro and Soda springs at 5.0%.

Demographics

Demographics Wadesboro vs Soda springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Wadesboro Soda springs
Black 70 Data is updating
White 25 30
Asian 5 100
Hispanic Data is updating Data is updating
Two or More Races Data is updating Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Wadesboro vs Soda springs

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Wadesboro at 70% compared to 0% in Soda springs.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Soda springs at 30% compared to 25% in Wadesboro.
  • In Soda springs, the Asian population stands at 100%, greater than 5% in Wadesboro.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Wadesboro and Soda springs at 0%.
  • Both Wadesboro and Soda springs have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 0%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Wadesboro and Soda springs at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Wadesboro Soda springs
Mental Health Not Good 18.1% 17.7%
Physical Health Not Good 13.7% 10.3%
Depression 21.6% 21.4%
Smoking 22.2% 14.9%
Binge Drinking 13.9% 21.1%
Obesity 44.3% 29.7%
Disability Percentage 20.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Wadesboro vs Soda springs

  • More residents in Wadesboro report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 17.7% in Soda springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Wadesboro at 21.6% compared to 21.4% in Soda springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Wadesboro at 22.2% compared to 14.9% in Soda springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Soda springs at 21.1% compared to 13.9% in Wadesboro.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Wadesboro at 44.3% compared to 29.7% in Soda springs.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Wadesboro at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Wadesboro Soda springs
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 19.2% (953) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 11.8% (587) 22.2% (12)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.5% (472) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Wadesboro vs Soda springs

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Wadesboro and Soda springs at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Wadesboro hold a high school diploma at 19.2% compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Soda springs at 22.2%, compared to 11.8% in Wadesboro.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Wadesboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.5% compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.