Demographics details for Wadesboro, NC vs Sanford, ME
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wadesboro, NC vs Sanford, ME.
| Data | Wadesboro | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,966 | 22,266 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 39.3 years |
| Median Income | $32,022 | $71,848 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 2.7 |
Population Comparison: Wadesboro vs Sanford
- The population in Sanford is higher at 22,266, compared to 4,966 in Wadesboro.
- The median age in Sanford is higher at 39.3 years, compared to 38.3 years in Wadesboro.
- Sanford has a higher median income of $71,848, compared to $32,022 in Wadesboro.
- In Sanford, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 20.0% in Wadesboro.
- The poverty level is higher in Sanford at 8%, compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- The unemployment rate in Wadesboro is higher at 5.0%, compared to 2.7% in Sanford.
Demographics
Demographics Wadesboro vs Sanford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wadesboro | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 70 | 1 |
| White | 25 | 89 |
| Asian | 5 | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 3 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wadesboro vs Sanford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Wadesboro at 70% compared to 1% in Sanford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sanford at 89% compared to 25% in Wadesboro.
- The Asian population is larger in Wadesboro at 5% compared to 2% in Sanford.
- Sanford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sanford at 5%, compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Wadesboro and Sanford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wadesboro | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 21.6% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 22.2% | 18.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 44.3% | 33.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wadesboro vs Sanford
- In Sanford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 18.1% in Wadesboro.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sanford at 25.3% versus 21.6% in Wadesboro.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wadesboro at 22.2% compared to 18.4% in Sanford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sanford at 18.2% compared to 13.9% in Wadesboro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wadesboro at 44.3% compared to 33.4% in Sanford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wadesboro at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Sanford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wadesboro | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (79) |
| High School Diploma | 19.2% (953) | 21.5% (4,797) |
| Less than High School | 11.8% (587) | 12.1% (2,692) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.5% (472) | 15.7% (3,505) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wadesboro vs Sanford
- In Sanford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Wadesboro.
- In Sanford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.5% compared to 19.2% in Wadesboro.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sanford at 12.1%, compared to 11.8% in Wadesboro.
- In Sanford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 9.5% in Wadesboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.