Demographics details for Wadesboro, NC vs Laurel, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wadesboro, NC vs Laurel, MD.
| Data | Wadesboro | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,966 | 29,352 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $32,022 | $92,035 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Wadesboro vs Laurel
- The population in Laurel is higher at 29,352, compared to 4,966 in Wadesboro.
- Residents in Wadesboro have a higher median age of 38.3 years compared to 36.4 years in Laurel.
- Laurel has a higher median income of $92,035, compared to $32,022 in Wadesboro.
- In Laurel, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 20.0% in Wadesboro.
- The poverty level is higher in Laurel at 9%, compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- The unemployment rate in Wadesboro is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.4% in Laurel.
Demographics
Demographics Wadesboro vs Laurel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wadesboro | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 70 | 52 |
| White | 25 | 11 |
| Asian | 5 | 10 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 18 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Wadesboro vs Laurel
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Wadesboro at 70% compared to 52% in Laurel.
- Wadesboro has a higher percentage of White residents at 25% compared to 11% in Laurel.
- In Laurel, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 5% in Wadesboro.
- Laurel has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Laurel at 8%, compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- In Laurel, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wadesboro | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 8.6% |
| Depression | 21.6% | 13.1% |
| Smoking | 22.2% | 10.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 12.4% |
| Obesity | 44.3% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wadesboro vs Laurel
- More residents in Wadesboro report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 13.1% in Laurel.
- Depression is more prevalent in Wadesboro at 21.6% compared to 13.1% in Laurel.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wadesboro at 22.2% compared to 10.4% in Laurel.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wadesboro at 13.9% compared to 12.4% in Laurel.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wadesboro at 44.3% compared to 36.6% in Laurel.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wadesboro at 20.0% compared to 7.0% in Laurel.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wadesboro | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.8% (521) |
| High School Diploma | 19.2% (953) | 10.0% (2,934) |
| Less than High School | 11.8% (587) | 12.3% (3,616) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.5% (472) | 30.9% (9,081) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wadesboro vs Laurel
- In Laurel, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Wadesboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wadesboro hold a high school diploma at 19.2% compared to 10.0% in Laurel.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Laurel at 12.3%, compared to 11.8% in Wadesboro.
- In Laurel, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.9% compared to 9.5% in Wadesboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.