Demographics details for Wadesboro, NC vs Fountain hills, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wadesboro, NC vs Fountain hills, AZ.
| Data | Wadesboro | Fountain hills |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,966 | 23,785 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 60.2 years |
| Median Income | $32,022 | $100,317 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 58.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Wadesboro vs Fountain hills
- The population in Fountain hills is higher at 23,785, compared to 4,966 in Wadesboro.
- The median age in Fountain hills is higher at 60.2 years, compared to 38.3 years in Wadesboro.
- Fountain hills has a higher median income of $100,317, compared to $32,022 in Wadesboro.
- In Fountain hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 20.0% in Wadesboro.
- The poverty level is identical in both Wadesboro and Fountain hills at 0%.
- The unemployment rate in Wadesboro is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.2% in Fountain hills.
Demographics
Demographics Wadesboro vs Fountain hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wadesboro | Fountain hills |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 70 | 2 |
| White | 25 | 89 |
| Asian | 5 | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 3 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wadesboro vs Fountain hills
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Wadesboro at 70% compared to 2% in Fountain hills.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fountain hills at 89% compared to 25% in Wadesboro.
- The Asian population is larger in Wadesboro at 5% compared to 2% in Fountain hills.
- Fountain hills has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fountain hills at 4%, compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Wadesboro and Fountain hills at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wadesboro | Fountain hills |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 8.0% |
| Depression | 21.6% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 22.2% | 10.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 44.3% | 26.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wadesboro vs Fountain hills
- More residents in Wadesboro report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 15.1% in Fountain hills.
- Depression is more prevalent in Wadesboro at 21.6% compared to 19.7% in Fountain hills.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wadesboro at 22.2% compared to 10.7% in Fountain hills.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fountain hills at 19.8% compared to 13.9% in Wadesboro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wadesboro at 44.3% compared to 26.5% in Fountain hills.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wadesboro at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Fountain hills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wadesboro | Fountain hills |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (88) |
| High School Diploma | 19.2% (953) | 11.7% (2,782) |
| Less than High School | 11.8% (587) | 3.7% (876) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.5% (472) | 42.2% (10,044) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wadesboro vs Fountain hills
- In Fountain hills, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Wadesboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wadesboro hold a high school diploma at 19.2% compared to 11.7% in Fountain hills.
- More residents in Wadesboro have less than a high school education at 11.8% compared to 3.7% in Fountain hills.
- In Fountain hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 9.5% in Wadesboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.