Demographics details for Wadesboro, NC vs Central point, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Wadesboro, NC vs Central point, OR.

Data Wadesboro Central point
Population 4,966 19,222
Median Age 38.3 years 40.3 years
Median Income $32,022 $79,731
Married Families 20.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 4.5

Population Comparison: Wadesboro vs Central point

  • The population in Central point is higher at 19,222, compared to 4,966 in Wadesboro.
  • The median age in Central point is higher at 40.3 years, compared to 38.3 years in Wadesboro.
  • Central point has a higher median income of $79,731, compared to $32,022 in Wadesboro.
  • In Central point, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 20.0% in Wadesboro.
  • The poverty level is higher in Central point at 10%, compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
  • The unemployment rate in Wadesboro is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.5% in Central point.

Demographics

Demographics Wadesboro vs Central point provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Wadesboro Central point
Black 70 Data is updating
White 25 76
Asian 5 1
Hispanic Data is updating 15
Two or More Races Data is updating 7
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Wadesboro vs Central point

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Wadesboro at 70% compared to 0% in Central point.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Central point at 76% compared to 25% in Wadesboro.
  • The Asian population is larger in Wadesboro at 5% compared to 1% in Central point.
  • Central point has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central point at 7%, compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
  • In Central point, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Wadesboro.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Wadesboro Central point
Mental Health Not Good 18.1% 19.4%
Physical Health Not Good 13.7% 12.0%
Depression 21.6% 29.4%
Smoking 22.2% 16.7%
Binge Drinking 13.9% 16.5%
Obesity 44.3% 30.1%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Wadesboro vs Central point

  • In Central point, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.1% in Wadesboro.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Central point at 29.4% versus 21.6% in Wadesboro.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Wadesboro at 22.2% compared to 16.7% in Central point.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Central point at 16.5% compared to 13.9% in Wadesboro.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Wadesboro at 44.3% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Wadesboro at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Central point.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Wadesboro Central point
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.7% (319)
High School Diploma 19.2% (953) 16.1% (3,095)
Less than High School 11.8% (587) 13.2% (2,530)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.5% (472) 15.6% (3,003)

Education Levels Comparison: Wadesboro vs Central point

  • In Central point, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Wadesboro.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Wadesboro hold a high school diploma at 19.2% compared to 16.1% in Central point.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central point at 13.2%, compared to 11.8% in Wadesboro.
  • In Central point, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 9.5% in Wadesboro.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.