Demographics details for Wadesboro, NC vs Cambridge, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wadesboro, NC vs Cambridge, MA.
Data | Wadesboro | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,966 | 118,488 |
Median Age | 38.3 years | 30.6 years |
Median Income | $32,022 | $121,539 |
Married Families | 20.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Wadesboro vs Cambridge
- The population in Cambridge is higher at 118,488, compared to 4,966 in Wadesboro.
- Residents in Wadesboro have a higher median age of 38.3 years compared to 30.6 years in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher median income of $121,539, compared to $32,022 in Wadesboro.
- In Cambridge, the percentage of married families is higher at 29.0%, compared to 20.0% in Wadesboro.
- The poverty level is higher in Cambridge at 14%, compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- The unemployment rate in Wadesboro is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.3% in Cambridge.
Demographics
Demographics Wadesboro vs Cambridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Wadesboro | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Black | 70 | 11 |
White | 25 | 53 |
Asian | 5 | 19 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 9 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wadesboro vs Cambridge
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Wadesboro at 70% compared to 11% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cambridge at 53% compared to 25% in Wadesboro.
- In Cambridge, the Asian population stands at 19%, greater than 5% in Wadesboro.
- Cambridge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cambridge at 8%, compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Wadesboro and Cambridge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Wadesboro | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 12.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 7.6% |
Depression | 21.6% | 19.2% |
Smoking | 22.2% | 8.1% |
Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 44.3% | 23.8% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wadesboro vs Cambridge
- More residents in Wadesboro report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 12.8% in Cambridge.
- Depression is more prevalent in Wadesboro at 21.6% compared to 19.2% in Cambridge.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wadesboro at 22.2% compared to 8.1% in Cambridge.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cambridge at 17.7% compared to 13.9% in Wadesboro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wadesboro at 44.3% compared to 23.8% in Cambridge.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wadesboro at 20.0% compared to 7.0% in Cambridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Wadesboro | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (1,031) |
High School Diploma | 19.2% (953) | 3.7% (4,373) |
Less than High School | 11.8% (587) | 4.6% (5,440) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.5% (472) | 54.0% (63,931) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wadesboro vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Wadesboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wadesboro hold a high school diploma at 19.2% compared to 3.7% in Cambridge.
- More residents in Wadesboro have less than a high school education at 11.8% compared to 4.6% in Cambridge.
- In Cambridge, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.0% compared to 9.5% in Wadesboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.