Demographics details for Wadesboro, NC vs Bigfork, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wadesboro, NC vs Bigfork, MN.
| Data | Wadesboro | Bigfork |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,966 | 403 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 66.3 years |
| Median Income | $32,022 | $33,750 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Wadesboro vs Bigfork
- In Wadesboro, the population is higher at 4,966, compared to 403 in Bigfork.
- The median age in Bigfork is higher at 66.3 years, compared to 38.3 years in Wadesboro.
- Bigfork has a higher median income of $33,750, compared to $32,022 in Wadesboro.
- In Bigfork, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 20.0% in Wadesboro.
- The poverty level is higher in Bigfork at 9%, compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- The unemployment rate in Wadesboro is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Bigfork.
Demographics
Demographics Wadesboro vs Bigfork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wadesboro | Bigfork |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 70 | 1 |
| White | 25 | 93 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Wadesboro vs Bigfork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Wadesboro at 70% compared to 1% in Bigfork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bigfork at 93% compared to 25% in Wadesboro.
- The Asian population is larger in Wadesboro at 5% compared to 0% in Bigfork.
- Bigfork has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bigfork at 1%, compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- In Bigfork, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wadesboro | Bigfork |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 21.6% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 22.2% | 21.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 44.3% | 41.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wadesboro vs Bigfork
- More residents in Wadesboro report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 16.0% in Bigfork.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bigfork at 24.3% versus 21.6% in Wadesboro.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wadesboro at 22.2% compared to 21.9% in Bigfork.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bigfork at 18.4% compared to 13.9% in Wadesboro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wadesboro at 44.3% compared to 41.6% in Bigfork.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bigfork at 23.0% compared to 20.0% in Wadesboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wadesboro | Bigfork |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 19.2% (953) | 26.6% (107) |
| Less than High School | 11.8% (587) | 9.7% (39) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.5% (472) | 8.2% (33) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wadesboro vs Bigfork
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Wadesboro and Bigfork at 0.0%.
- In Bigfork, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.6% compared to 19.2% in Wadesboro.
- More residents in Wadesboro have less than a high school education at 11.8% compared to 9.7% in Bigfork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wadesboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.5% compared to 8.2% in Bigfork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.