Demographics details for Waddington, NY vs Frisco, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Waddington, NY vs Frisco, TX.

Data Waddington Frisco
Population 2,214 219,587
Median Age 38.0 years 37.8 years
Median Income $54,000 $144,567
Married Families 58.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 10% 3%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 3.9

Population Comparison: Waddington vs Frisco

  • The population in Frisco is higher at 219,587, compared to 2,214 in Waddington.
  • Residents in Waddington have a higher median age of 38.0 years compared to 37.8 years in Frisco.
  • Frisco has a higher median income of $144,567, compared to $54,000 in Waddington.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Waddington at 58.0% compared to 44.0% in Frisco.
  • Waddington has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 3% in Frisco.
  • Frisco has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.0% in Waddington.

Demographics

Demographics Waddington vs Frisco provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Waddington Frisco
Black Data is updating 8
White 100 49
Asian Data is updating 23
Hispanic Data is updating 12
Two or More Races Data is updating 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Waddington vs Frisco

  • In Frisco, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 0% in Waddington.
  • Waddington has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 49% in Frisco.
  • In Frisco, the Asian population stands at 23%, greater than 0% in Waddington.
  • Frisco has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 0% in Waddington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Frisco at 8%, compared to 0% in Waddington.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waddington and Frisco at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Waddington Frisco
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 13.4%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 7.9%
Depression Data is updating% 20.8%
Smoking Data is updating% 9.6%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 18.4%
Obesity Data is updating% 27.4%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 6.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Waddington vs Frisco

  • In Frisco, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.4% compared to 0.0% in Waddington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Frisco at 20.8% versus 0.0% in Waddington.
  • Frisco has a higher smoking rate at 9.6% compared to 0.0% in Waddington.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Frisco at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Waddington.
  • Frisco has higher obesity rates at 27.4% compared to 0.0% in Waddington.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Frisco at 6.0% compared to 0.0% in Waddington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Waddington Frisco
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.6% (1,358)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 5.0% (11,084)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 3.4% (7,431)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 38.9% (85,346)

Education Levels Comparison: Waddington vs Frisco

  • In Frisco, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Waddington.
  • In Frisco, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 5.0% compared to 0.0% in Waddington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Frisco at 3.4%, compared to 0.0% in Waddington.
  • In Frisco, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 0.0% in Waddington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.