Demographics details for Waddington, NY vs Clayton, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Waddington, NY vs Clayton, NC.

Data Waddington Clayton
Population 2,214 29,445
Median Age 38.0 years 32.6 years
Median Income $54,000 $71,698
Married Families 58.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 10% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 3.7

Population Comparison: Waddington vs Clayton

  • The population in Clayton is higher at 29,445, compared to 2,214 in Waddington.
  • Residents in Waddington have a higher median age of 38.0 years compared to 32.6 years in Clayton.
  • Clayton has a higher median income of $71,698, compared to $54,000 in Waddington.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Waddington at 58.0% compared to 35.0% in Clayton.
  • Waddington has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Clayton.
  • Clayton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.0% in Waddington.

Demographics

Demographics Waddington vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Waddington Clayton
Black Data is updating 22
White 100 59
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 13
Two or More Races Data is updating 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Waddington vs Clayton

  • In Clayton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 0% in Waddington.
  • Waddington has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 59% in Clayton.
  • In Clayton, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Waddington.
  • Clayton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 0% in Waddington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clayton at 5%, compared to 0% in Waddington.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waddington and Clayton at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Waddington Clayton
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.6%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 10.4%
Depression Data is updating% 23.1%
Smoking Data is updating% 15.2%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 17.6%
Obesity Data is updating% 39.9%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Waddington vs Clayton

  • In Clayton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Waddington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Clayton at 23.1% versus 0.0% in Waddington.
  • Clayton has a higher smoking rate at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Waddington.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Clayton at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Waddington.
  • Clayton has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 0.0% in Waddington.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clayton at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Waddington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Waddington Clayton
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.7% (210)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 12.6% (3,700)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 5.4% (1,598)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 18.6% (5,471)

Education Levels Comparison: Waddington vs Clayton

  • In Clayton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Waddington.
  • In Clayton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.6% compared to 0.0% in Waddington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clayton at 5.4%, compared to 0.0% in Waddington.
  • In Clayton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 0.0% in Waddington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.