Demographics details for Vidalia, LA vs Beaver dam, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Vidalia, LA vs Beaver dam, WI.
| Data | Vidalia | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,897 | 16,582 |
| Median Age | 42.9 years | 40.4 years |
| Median Income | $43,684 | $65,802 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Vidalia vs Beaver dam
- The population in Beaver dam is higher at 16,582, compared to 3,897 in Vidalia.
- Residents in Vidalia have a higher median age of 42.9 years compared to 40.4 years in Beaver dam.
- Beaver dam has a higher median income of $65,802, compared to $43,684 in Vidalia.
- In Beaver dam, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 34.0% in Vidalia.
- Vidalia has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
- The unemployment rate in Vidalia is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.
Demographics
Demographics Vidalia vs Beaver dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Vidalia | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 24 | 3 |
| White | 75 | 81 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Vidalia vs Beaver dam
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Vidalia at 24% compared to 3% in Beaver dam.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Beaver dam at 81% compared to 75% in Vidalia.
- In Beaver dam, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Vidalia.
- Beaver dam has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Vidalia.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Beaver dam at 6%, compared to 1% in Vidalia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Vidalia and Beaver dam at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Vidalia | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 28.2% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 23.7% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 23.5% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Vidalia vs Beaver dam
- More residents in Vidalia report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 15.7% in Beaver dam.
- Depression is more prevalent in Vidalia at 28.2% compared to 23.6% in Beaver dam.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Vidalia at 23.7% compared to 17.6% in Beaver dam.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 17.5% in Vidalia.
- Obesity rates are higher in Vidalia at 40.5% compared to 36.6% in Beaver dam.
- Disability percentages are higher in Vidalia at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Beaver dam.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Vidalia | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (55) | 0.3% (47) |
| High School Diploma | 20.7% (805) | 23.8% (3,947) |
| Less than High School | 14.8% (577) | 10.3% (1,706) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.1% (667) | 18.2% (3,023) |
Education Levels Comparison: Vidalia vs Beaver dam
- A higher percentage of residents in Vidalia have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.3% in Beaver dam.
- In Beaver dam, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.8% compared to 20.7% in Vidalia.
- More residents in Vidalia have less than a high school education at 14.8% compared to 10.3% in Beaver dam.
- In Beaver dam, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 17.1% in Vidalia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.