Demographics details for Vidalia, GA vs Three oaks, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Vidalia, GA vs Three oaks, MI.
| Data | Vidalia | Three oaks |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,668 | 1,397 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 40.4 years |
| Median Income | $47,124 | $57,083 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Vidalia vs Three oaks
- In Vidalia, the population is higher at 10,668, compared to 1,397 in Three oaks.
- The median age in Three oaks is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 37.4 years in Vidalia.
- Three oaks has a higher median income of $57,083, compared to $47,124 in Vidalia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Vidalia at 32.0% compared to 27.0% in Three oaks.
- Vidalia has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 12% in Three oaks.
- The unemployment rate in Vidalia is higher at 5.0%, compared to 2.9% in Three oaks.
Demographics
Demographics Vidalia vs Three oaks provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Vidalia | Three oaks |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 39 | Data is updating |
| White | 48 | 52 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 26 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 21 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Vidalia vs Three oaks
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Vidalia at 39% compared to 0% in Three oaks.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Three oaks at 52% compared to 48% in Vidalia.
- The Asian population is larger in Vidalia at 2% compared to 1% in Three oaks.
- Three oaks has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 26%, compared to 4% in Vidalia.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Three oaks at 21%, compared to 7% in Vidalia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Vidalia and Three oaks at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Vidalia | Three oaks |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 20.9% | 17.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 42.2% | 35.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Vidalia vs Three oaks
- More residents in Vidalia report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 17.0% in Three oaks.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Three oaks at 25.3% versus 21.4% in Vidalia.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Vidalia at 20.9% compared to 17.8% in Three oaks.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Three oaks at 19.4% compared to 13.9% in Vidalia.
- Obesity rates are higher in Vidalia at 42.2% compared to 35.0% in Three oaks.
- Disability percentages are higher in Vidalia at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Three oaks.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Vidalia | Three oaks |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (97) | 1.8% (25) |
| High School Diploma | 14.4% (1,539) | 16.2% (226) |
| Less than High School | 7.9% (846) | 8.2% (114) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.3% (1,525) | 12.2% (171) |
Education Levels Comparison: Vidalia vs Three oaks
- In Three oaks, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.9% in Vidalia.
- In Three oaks, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.2% compared to 14.4% in Vidalia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Three oaks at 8.2%, compared to 7.9% in Vidalia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Vidalia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.3% compared to 12.2% in Three oaks.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.