Demographics details for Vidalia, GA vs Alum creek, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Vidalia, GA vs Alum creek, WV.
| Data | Vidalia | Alum creek |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,668 | 1,420 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 47.4 years |
| Median Income | $47,124 | $65,179 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Vidalia vs Alum creek
- In Vidalia, the population is higher at 10,668, compared to 1,420 in Alum creek.
- The median age in Alum creek is higher at 47.4 years, compared to 37.4 years in Vidalia.
- Alum creek has a higher median income of $65,179, compared to $47,124 in Vidalia.
- In Alum creek, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 32.0% in Vidalia.
- Vidalia has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Alum creek.
- The unemployment rate in Vidalia is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.5% in Alum creek.
Demographics
Demographics Vidalia vs Alum creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Vidalia | Alum creek |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 39 | Data is updating |
| White | 48 | 100 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 7 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Vidalia vs Alum creek
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Vidalia at 39% compared to 0% in Alum creek.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Alum creek at 100% compared to 48% in Vidalia.
- The Asian population is larger in Vidalia at 2% compared to 0% in Alum creek.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Vidalia at 4% compared to 0% in Alum creek.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Vidalia at 7% compared to 0% in Alum creek.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Vidalia and Alum creek at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Vidalia | Alum creek |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 29.5% |
| Smoking | 20.9% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 42.2% | 40.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Vidalia vs Alum creek
- In Alum creek, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 18.6% in Vidalia.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Alum creek at 29.5% versus 21.4% in Vidalia.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Vidalia at 20.9% compared to 20.6% in Alum creek.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Alum creek at 15.1% compared to 13.9% in Vidalia.
- Obesity rates are higher in Vidalia at 42.2% compared to 40.1% in Alum creek.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Alum creek at 30.0% compared to 18.0% in Vidalia.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Vidalia | Alum creek |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (97) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.4% (1,539) | 34.9% (496) |
| Less than High School | 7.9% (846) | 8.9% (126) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.3% (1,525) | 9.7% (138) |
Education Levels Comparison: Vidalia vs Alum creek
- A higher percentage of residents in Vidalia have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Alum creek.
- In Alum creek, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 34.9% compared to 14.4% in Vidalia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Alum creek at 8.9%, compared to 7.9% in Vidalia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Vidalia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.3% compared to 9.7% in Alum creek.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.