Demographics details for Victorville, CA vs South portland, ME

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Victorville, CA vs South portland, ME.

Data Victorville South portland
Population 137,221 27,026
Median Age 31.8 years 41.0 years
Median Income $65,746 $82,489
Married Families 31.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 12% 7%
Unemployment Rate 7.5 2.4

Population Comparison: Victorville vs South portland

  • In Victorville, the population is higher at 137,221, compared to 27,026 in South portland.
  • The median age in South portland is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 31.8 years in Victorville.
  • South portland has a higher median income of $82,489, compared to $65,746 in Victorville.
  • In South portland, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 31.0% in Victorville.
  • Victorville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 7% in South portland.
  • The unemployment rate in Victorville is higher at 7.5%, compared to 2.4% in South portland.

Demographics

Demographics Victorville vs South portland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Victorville South portland
Black 17 7
White 4 83
Asian 4 2
Hispanic 54 3
Two or More Races 19 5
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Victorville vs South portland

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Victorville at 17% compared to 7% in South portland.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in South portland at 83% compared to 4% in Victorville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Victorville at 4% compared to 2% in South portland.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Victorville at 54% compared to 3% in South portland.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Victorville at 19% compared to 5% in South portland.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Victorville at 2% compared to 0% in South portland.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Victorville South portland
Mental Health Not Good 18.4% 14.8%
Physical Health Not Good 14.4% 8.5%
Depression 19.0% 23.8%
Smoking 16.2% 12.2%
Binge Drinking 14.8% 20.1%
Obesity 41.3% 26.2%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Victorville vs South portland

  • More residents in Victorville report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 14.8% in South portland.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South portland at 23.8% versus 19.0% in Victorville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Victorville at 16.2% compared to 12.2% in South portland.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in South portland at 20.1% compared to 14.8% in Victorville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Victorville at 41.3% compared to 26.2% in South portland.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Victorville and South portland at 13.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Victorville South portland
No Schooling 1.7% (2,334) 0.3% (93)
High School Diploma 15.1% (20,711) 13.2% (3,562)
Less than High School 24.1% (33,076) 4.4% (1,202)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 6.6% (9,125) 35.5% (9,604)

Education Levels Comparison: Victorville vs South portland

  • A higher percentage of residents in Victorville have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.3% in South portland.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Victorville hold a high school diploma at 15.1% compared to 13.2% in South portland.
  • More residents in Victorville have less than a high school education at 24.1% compared to 4.4% in South portland.
  • In South portland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.5% compared to 6.6% in Victorville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.