Demographics details for Victorville, CA vs Fort scott, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Victorville, CA vs Fort scott, KS.
| Data | Victorville | Fort scott |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 137,221 | 7,615 |
| Median Age | 31.8 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $65,746 | $45,206 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Victorville vs Fort scott
- In Victorville, the population is higher at 137,221, compared to 7,615 in Fort scott.
- The median age in Fort scott is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 31.8 years in Victorville.
- Victorville has a higher median income of $65,746 compared to $45,206 in Fort scott.
- In Fort scott, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 31.0% in Victorville.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort scott at 14%, compared to 12% in Victorville.
- The unemployment rate in Victorville is higher at 7.5%, compared to 4.5% in Fort scott.
Demographics
Demographics Victorville vs Fort scott provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Victorville | Fort scott |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 4 |
| White | 4 | 87 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 54 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 19 | 6 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Victorville vs Fort scott
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Victorville at 17% compared to 4% in Fort scott.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort scott at 87% compared to 4% in Victorville.
- The Asian population is larger in Victorville at 4% compared to 0% in Fort scott.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Victorville at 54% compared to 3% in Fort scott.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Victorville at 19% compared to 6% in Fort scott.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Victorville at 2% compared to 0% in Fort scott.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Victorville | Fort scott |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 19.0% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 16.2% | 22.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 41.3% | 42.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Victorville vs Fort scott
- More residents in Victorville report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 18.3% in Fort scott.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort scott at 23.2% versus 19.0% in Victorville.
- Fort scott has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 16.2% in Victorville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort scott at 16.6% compared to 14.8% in Victorville.
- Fort scott has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 41.3% in Victorville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort scott at 21.0% compared to 13.0% in Victorville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Victorville | Fort scott |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (2,334) | 0.4% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 15.1% (20,711) | 13.7% (1,041) |
| Less than High School | 24.1% (33,076) | 16.9% (1,285) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.6% (9,125) | 13.5% (1,029) |
Education Levels Comparison: Victorville vs Fort scott
- A higher percentage of residents in Victorville have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.4% in Fort scott.
- A higher percentage of residents in Victorville hold a high school diploma at 15.1% compared to 13.7% in Fort scott.
- More residents in Victorville have less than a high school education at 24.1% compared to 16.9% in Fort scott.
- In Fort scott, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.5% compared to 6.6% in Victorville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.