Demographics details for Victorville, CA vs Carthage, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Victorville, CA vs Carthage, MS.
Data | Victorville | Carthage |
---|---|---|
Population | 137,221 | 4,813 |
Median Age | 31.8 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $65,746 | $47,722 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 23.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 7.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Victorville vs Carthage
- In Victorville, the population is higher at 137,221, compared to 4,813 in Carthage.
- The median age in Carthage is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 31.8 years in Victorville.
- Victorville has a higher median income of $65,746 compared to $47,722 in Carthage.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Victorville at 31.0% compared to 23.0% in Carthage.
- The poverty level is higher in Carthage at 15%, compared to 12% in Victorville.
- The unemployment rate in Victorville is higher at 7.5%, compared to 4.2% in Carthage.
Demographics
Demographics Victorville vs Carthage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Victorville | Carthage |
---|---|---|
Black | 17 | 45 |
White | 4 | 36 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 54 | 18 |
Two or More Races | 19 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Victorville vs Carthage
- In Carthage, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 45% compared to 17% in Victorville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Carthage at 36% compared to 4% in Victorville.
- The Asian population is larger in Victorville at 4% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Victorville at 54% compared to 18% in Carthage.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Victorville at 19% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Victorville at 2% compared to 1% in Carthage.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Victorville | Carthage |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 19.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 15.8% |
Depression | 19.0% | 21.6% |
Smoking | 16.2% | 25.3% |
Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 12.5% |
Obesity | 41.3% | 46.5% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Victorville vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.4% in Victorville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carthage at 21.6% versus 19.0% in Victorville.
- Carthage has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 16.2% in Victorville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Victorville at 14.8% compared to 12.5% in Carthage.
- Carthage has higher obesity rates at 46.5% compared to 41.3% in Victorville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carthage at 23.0% compared to 13.0% in Victorville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Victorville | Carthage |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (2,334) | 3.0% (145) |
High School Diploma | 15.1% (20,711) | 16.7% (806) |
Less than High School | 24.1% (33,076) | 16.9% (811) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.6% (9,125) | 12.1% (583) |
Education Levels Comparison: Victorville vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.7% in Victorville.
- In Carthage, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 15.1% in Victorville.
- More residents in Victorville have less than a high school education at 24.1% compared to 16.9% in Carthage.
- In Carthage, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.1% compared to 6.6% in Victorville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.