Demographics details for Victoria, TX vs Shreveport, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Victoria, TX vs Shreveport, LA.
| Data | Victoria | Shreveport |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 65,372 | 180,153 |
| Median Age | 34.7 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $64,832 | $45,967 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Victoria vs Shreveport
- The population in Shreveport is higher at 180,153, compared to 65,372 in Victoria.
- The median age in Shreveport is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 34.7 years in Victoria.
- Victoria has a higher median income of $64,832 compared to $45,967 in Shreveport.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Victoria at 36.0% compared to 29.0% in Shreveport.
- The poverty level is higher in Shreveport at 21%, compared to 13% in Victoria.
- Shreveport has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.8% in Victoria.
Demographics
Demographics Victoria vs Shreveport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Victoria | Shreveport |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 58 |
| White | 14 | 33 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 56 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Victoria vs Shreveport
- In Shreveport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 7% in Victoria.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Shreveport at 33% compared to 14% in Victoria.
- Both Victoria and Shreveport have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Victoria at 56% compared to 3% in Shreveport.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Victoria at 21% compared to 4% in Shreveport.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Victoria and Shreveport at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Victoria | Shreveport |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 24.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 41.7% | 42.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Victoria vs Shreveport
- In Shreveport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 18.0% in Victoria.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Shreveport at 24.4% versus 23.2% in Victoria.
- Shreveport has a higher smoking rate at 24.3% compared to 17.6% in Victoria.
- Binge drinking is more common in Victoria at 17.0% compared to 16.2% in Shreveport.
- Shreveport has higher obesity rates at 42.5% compared to 41.7% in Victoria.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shreveport at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Victoria.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Victoria | Shreveport |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (904) | 1.2% (2,087) |
| High School Diploma | 16.1% (10,544) | 18.3% (33,032) |
| Less than High School | 21.7% (14,173) | 11.1% (20,070) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.4% (8,078) | 18.6% (33,461) |
Education Levels Comparison: Victoria vs Shreveport
- A higher percentage of residents in Victoria have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.2% in Shreveport.
- In Shreveport, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 16.1% in Victoria.
- More residents in Victoria have less than a high school education at 21.7% compared to 11.1% in Shreveport.
- In Shreveport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 12.4% in Victoria.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.