Demographics details for Victoria, TX vs Gloverville, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Victoria, TX vs Gloverville, SC.
Data | Victoria | Gloverville |
---|---|---|
Population | 65,372 | 3,099 |
Median Age | 34.7 years | 31.4 years |
Median Income | $64,832 | $46,643 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 20.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Victoria vs Gloverville
- In Victoria, the population is higher at 65,372, compared to 3,099 in Gloverville.
- Residents in Victoria have a higher median age of 34.7 years compared to 31.4 years in Gloverville.
- Victoria has a higher median income of $64,832 compared to $46,643 in Gloverville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Victoria at 36.0% compared to 20.0% in Gloverville.
- Victoria has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Gloverville.
- The unemployment rate in Victoria is higher at 4.8%, compared to 4.5% in Gloverville.
Demographics
Demographics Victoria vs Gloverville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Victoria | Gloverville |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | 18 |
White | 14 | 76 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 56 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 21 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Victoria vs Gloverville
- In Gloverville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 7% in Victoria.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gloverville at 76% compared to 14% in Victoria.
- The Asian population is larger in Victoria at 2% compared to 0% in Gloverville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Victoria at 56% compared to 6% in Gloverville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Victoria at 21% compared to 0% in Gloverville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Victoria and Gloverville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Victoria | Gloverville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 20.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 15.8% |
Depression | 23.2% | 24.7% |
Smoking | 17.6% | 25.0% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 16.1% |
Obesity | 41.7% | 39.3% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Victoria vs Gloverville
- In Gloverville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 18.0% in Victoria.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gloverville at 24.7% versus 23.2% in Victoria.
- Gloverville has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 17.6% in Victoria.
- Binge drinking is more common in Victoria at 17.0% compared to 16.1% in Gloverville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Victoria at 41.7% compared to 39.3% in Gloverville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gloverville at 24.0% compared to 15.0% in Victoria.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Victoria | Gloverville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (904) | 0.8% (25) |
High School Diploma | 16.1% (10,544) | 29.9% (927) |
Less than High School | 21.7% (14,173) | 19.7% (610) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.4% (8,078) | 4.3% (134) |
Education Levels Comparison: Victoria vs Gloverville
- A higher percentage of residents in Victoria have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.8% in Gloverville.
- In Gloverville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.9% compared to 16.1% in Victoria.
- More residents in Victoria have less than a high school education at 21.7% compared to 19.7% in Gloverville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Victoria hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.4% compared to 4.3% in Gloverville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.