Environment details: Viborg SD
poor quality; significant contaminants detected.
Environment details: Union springs AL
Moderate quality, local improvements ongoing.
Compare Environment: Viborg SD vs Union springs AL
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Viborg | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 121 | 867 |
| Water Quality | 3/10 | 5/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | poor quality; significant contaminants detected. | Moderate quality, local improvements ongoing. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.69 | 1.55 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 21 | 26 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Viborg vs Union springs
- The water quality in Union springs is superior at 5/10 compared to 3/10 in Viborg.
- The median air quality index is lower (worse) in Viborg at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Union springs.
- The average air quality index is worse in Viborg with 1.69 compared to 1.55 in Union springs.
- Union springs experiences more days with poor air quality at 26 compared to 21 in Viborg.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.