Demographics details for Viborg, SD vs Taylorsville, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Viborg, SD vs Taylorsville, NC.
| Data | Viborg | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 824 | 2,298 |
| Median Age | 50.3 years | 53.7 years |
| Median Income | $46,316 | $43,681 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Viborg vs Taylorsville
- The population in Taylorsville is higher at 2,298, compared to 824 in Viborg.
- The median age in Taylorsville is higher at 53.7 years, compared to 50.3 years in Viborg.
- Viborg has a higher median income of $46,316 compared to $43,681 in Taylorsville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Viborg at 31.0% compared to 30.0% in Taylorsville.
- The poverty level is identical in both Viborg and Taylorsville at 12%.
- Taylorsville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Viborg.
Demographics
Demographics Viborg vs Taylorsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Viborg | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 8 |
| White | 91 | 86 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Viborg vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 0% in Viborg.
- Viborg has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 86% in Taylorsville.
- Both Viborg and Taylorsville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Viborg at 4% compared to 3% in Taylorsville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Viborg at 4% compared to 3% in Taylorsville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Viborg at 1% compared to 0% in Taylorsville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Viborg | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 18.1% | 25.6% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 21.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.1% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 37.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Viborg vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 13.8% in Viborg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Taylorsville at 25.6% versus 18.1% in Viborg.
- Taylorsville has a higher smoking rate at 21.5% compared to 17.4% in Viborg.
- Binge drinking is more common in Viborg at 20.1% compared to 16.9% in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has higher obesity rates at 37.8% compared to 35.2% in Viborg.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Taylorsville at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Viborg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Viborg | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.2% (27) |
| High School Diploma | 22.8% (188) | 26.1% (599) |
| Less than High School | 14.2% (117) | 19.3% (444) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (120) | 11.0% (252) |
Education Levels Comparison: Viborg vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Viborg.
- In Taylorsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.1% compared to 22.8% in Viborg.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Taylorsville at 19.3%, compared to 14.2% in Viborg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Viborg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 11.0% in Taylorsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.