Demographics details for Viborg, SD vs Gatesville, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Viborg, SD vs Gatesville, TX.

Data Viborg Gatesville
Population 824 16,198
Median Age 50.3 years 39.4 years
Median Income $46,316 $46,536
Married Families 31.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 12% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.5

Population Comparison: Viborg vs Gatesville

  • The population in Gatesville is higher at 16,198, compared to 824 in Viborg.
  • Residents in Viborg have a higher median age of 50.3 years compared to 39.4 years in Gatesville.
  • Gatesville has a higher median income of $46,536, compared to $46,316 in Viborg.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Viborg at 31.0% compared to 27.0% in Gatesville.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Viborg and Gatesville at 12%.
  • Gatesville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Viborg.

Demographics

Demographics Viborg vs Gatesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Viborg Gatesville
Black Data is updating 15
White 91 42
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 4 25
Two or More Races 4 17
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Viborg vs Gatesville

  • In Gatesville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 0% in Viborg.
  • Viborg has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 42% in Gatesville.
  • In Gatesville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Viborg.
  • Gatesville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 4% in Viborg.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gatesville at 17%, compared to 4% in Viborg.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Viborg at 1% compared to 0% in Gatesville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Viborg Gatesville
Mental Health Not Good 13.8% 21.2%
Physical Health Not Good 9.5% 14.3%
Depression 18.1% 29.6%
Smoking 17.4% 22.2%
Binge Drinking 20.1% 15.1%
Obesity 35.2% 43.6%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Viborg vs Gatesville

  • In Gatesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 13.8% in Viborg.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Gatesville at 29.6% versus 18.1% in Viborg.
  • Gatesville has a higher smoking rate at 22.2% compared to 17.4% in Viborg.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Viborg at 20.1% compared to 15.1% in Gatesville.
  • Gatesville has higher obesity rates at 43.6% compared to 35.2% in Viborg.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Viborg at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Gatesville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Viborg Gatesville
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.8% (133)
High School Diploma 22.8% (188) 13.1% (2,118)
Less than High School 14.2% (117) 28.0% (4,538)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.6% (120) 6.9% (1,111)

Education Levels Comparison: Viborg vs Gatesville

  • In Gatesville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Viborg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Viborg hold a high school diploma at 22.8% compared to 13.1% in Gatesville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gatesville at 28.0%, compared to 14.2% in Viborg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Viborg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 6.9% in Gatesville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.