Demographics details for Viborg, SD vs Fairview heights, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Viborg, SD vs Fairview heights, IL.

Data Viborg Fairview heights
Population 824 16,324
Median Age 50.3 years 40.0 years
Median Income $46,316 $74,038
Married Families 31.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 12% 9%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.5

Population Comparison: Viborg vs Fairview heights

  • The population in Fairview heights is higher at 16,324, compared to 824 in Viborg.
  • Residents in Viborg have a higher median age of 50.3 years compared to 40.0 years in Fairview heights.
  • Fairview heights has a higher median income of $74,038, compared to $46,316 in Viborg.
  • In Fairview heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 31.0% in Viborg.
  • Viborg has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Fairview heights.
  • Fairview heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Viborg.

Demographics

Demographics Viborg vs Fairview heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Viborg Fairview heights
Black Data is updating 30
White 91 54
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 4 3
Two or More Races 4 12
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Viborg vs Fairview heights

  • In Fairview heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 30% compared to 0% in Viborg.
  • Viborg has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 54% in Fairview heights.
  • In Fairview heights, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Viborg.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Viborg at 4% compared to 3% in Fairview heights.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fairview heights at 12%, compared to 4% in Viborg.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Viborg at 1% compared to 0% in Fairview heights.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Viborg Fairview heights
Mental Health Not Good 13.8% 15.3%
Physical Health Not Good 9.5% 10.5%
Depression 18.1% 19.0%
Smoking 17.4% 15.5%
Binge Drinking 20.1% 16.8%
Obesity 35.2% 42.1%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Viborg vs Fairview heights

  • In Fairview heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 13.8% in Viborg.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Fairview heights at 19.0% versus 18.1% in Viborg.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Viborg at 17.4% compared to 15.5% in Fairview heights.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Viborg at 20.1% compared to 16.8% in Fairview heights.
  • Fairview heights has higher obesity rates at 42.1% compared to 35.2% in Viborg.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairview heights at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Viborg.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Viborg Fairview heights
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.0% (168)
High School Diploma 22.8% (188) 14.5% (2,359)
Less than High School 14.2% (117) 7.3% (1,187)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.6% (120) 22.0% (3,596)

Education Levels Comparison: Viborg vs Fairview heights

  • In Fairview heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Viborg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Viborg hold a high school diploma at 22.8% compared to 14.5% in Fairview heights.
  • More residents in Viborg have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 7.3% in Fairview heights.
  • In Fairview heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 14.6% in Viborg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.