Demographics details for Viborg, SD vs Chana, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Viborg, SD vs Chana, IL.
Data | Viborg | Chana |
---|---|---|
Population | 824 | 235 |
Median Age | 50.3 years | 38.0 years |
Median Income | $46,316 | $60,000 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 70.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Viborg vs Chana
- In Viborg, the population is higher at 824, compared to 235 in Chana.
- Residents in Viborg have a higher median age of 50.3 years compared to 38.0 years in Chana.
- Chana has a higher median income of $60,000, compared to $46,316 in Viborg.
- In Chana, the percentage of married families is higher at 70.0%, compared to 31.0% in Viborg.
- Viborg has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Chana.
- Chana has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.2% in Viborg.
Demographics
Demographics Viborg vs Chana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Viborg | Chana |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 91 | 100 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 4 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Viborg vs Chana
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Viborg and Chana at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chana at 100% compared to 91% in Viborg.
- Both Viborg and Chana have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Viborg at 4% compared to 0% in Chana.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Viborg at 4% compared to 0% in Chana.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Viborg at 1% compared to 0% in Chana.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Viborg | Chana |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 18.1% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 17.4% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 20.1% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 35.2% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Viborg vs Chana
- More residents in Viborg report poor mental health at 13.8% compared to 0.0% in Chana.
- Depression is more prevalent in Viborg at 18.1% compared to 0.0% in Chana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Viborg at 17.4% compared to 0.0% in Chana.
- Binge drinking is more common in Viborg at 20.1% compared to 0.0% in Chana.
- Obesity rates are higher in Viborg at 35.2% compared to 0.0% in Chana.
- Disability percentages are higher in Viborg at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Chana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Viborg | Chana |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 22.8% (188) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 14.2% (117) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (120) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Viborg vs Chana
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Viborg and Chana at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Viborg hold a high school diploma at 22.8% compared to 0.0% in Chana.
- More residents in Viborg have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 0.0% in Chana.
- A higher percentage of residents in Viborg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 0.0% in Chana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.