Demographics details for Viborg, SD vs Biloxi, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Viborg, SD vs Biloxi, MS.
| Data | Viborg | Biloxi |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 824 | 49,118 |
| Median Age | 50.3 years | 36.7 years |
| Median Income | $46,316 | $55,775 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Viborg vs Biloxi
- The population in Biloxi is higher at 49,118, compared to 824 in Viborg.
- Residents in Viborg have a higher median age of 50.3 years compared to 36.7 years in Biloxi.
- Biloxi has a higher median income of $55,775, compared to $46,316 in Viborg.
- In Biloxi, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 31.0% in Viborg.
- The poverty level is higher in Biloxi at 16%, compared to 12% in Viborg.
- Biloxi has a higher unemployment rate at 3.3% compared to 3.2% in Viborg.
Demographics
Demographics Viborg vs Biloxi provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Viborg | Biloxi |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 21 |
| White | 91 | 59 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Viborg vs Biloxi
- In Biloxi, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 0% in Viborg.
- Viborg has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 59% in Biloxi.
- In Biloxi, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Viborg.
- Biloxi has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 4% in Viborg.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Biloxi at 7%, compared to 4% in Viborg.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Viborg at 1% compared to 0% in Biloxi.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Viborg | Biloxi |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 18.1% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 20.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.1% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 34.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Viborg vs Biloxi
- In Biloxi, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 13.8% in Viborg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Biloxi at 22.0% versus 18.1% in Viborg.
- Biloxi has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 17.4% in Viborg.
- Binge drinking is more common in Viborg at 20.1% compared to 15.3% in Biloxi.
- Obesity rates are higher in Viborg at 35.2% compared to 34.8% in Biloxi.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Biloxi at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Viborg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Viborg | Biloxi |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.2% (601) |
| High School Diploma | 22.8% (188) | 12.1% (5,955) |
| Less than High School | 14.2% (117) | 13.0% (6,371) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (120) | 19.7% (9,654) |
Education Levels Comparison: Viborg vs Biloxi
- In Biloxi, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Viborg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Viborg hold a high school diploma at 22.8% compared to 12.1% in Biloxi.
- More residents in Viborg have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 13.0% in Biloxi.
- In Biloxi, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.7% compared to 14.6% in Viborg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.