Demographics details for Vero beach, FL vs Clayton, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Vero beach, FL vs Clayton, NY.
Data | Vero beach | Clayton |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,096 | 4,781 |
Median Age | 54.3 years | 46.6 years |
Median Income | $59,335 | $74,471 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 48.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Vero beach vs Clayton
- In Vero beach, the population is higher at 17,096, compared to 4,781 in Clayton.
- Residents in Vero beach have a higher median age of 54.3 years compared to 46.6 years in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $74,471, compared to $59,335 in Vero beach.
- In Clayton, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 39.0% in Vero beach.
- The poverty level is identical in both Vero beach and Clayton at 10%.
- Clayton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Vero beach.
Demographics
Demographics Vero beach vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Vero beach | Clayton |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | Data is updating |
White | 74 | 95 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 9 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Vero beach vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Vero beach at 7% compared to 0% in Clayton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clayton at 95% compared to 74% in Vero beach.
- The Asian population is larger in Vero beach at 3% compared to 0% in Clayton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Vero beach at 9% compared to 1% in Clayton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Vero beach at 7% compared to 4% in Clayton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Vero beach and Clayton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Vero beach | Clayton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 18.8% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 20.2% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 16.0% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 31.3% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Vero beach vs Clayton
- More residents in Vero beach report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Vero beach at 18.8% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Vero beach at 20.2% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Vero beach at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Vero beach at 31.3% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Vero beach and Clayton at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Vero beach | Clayton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.4% (409) | 0.1% (4) |
High School Diploma | 15.7% (2,688) | 18.3% (874) |
Less than High School | 13.0% (2,224) | 14.2% (679) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.6% (5,060) | 20.6% (983) |
Education Levels Comparison: Vero beach vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of residents in Vero beach have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.1% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 15.7% in Vero beach.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clayton at 14.2%, compared to 13.0% in Vero beach.
- A higher percentage of residents in Vero beach hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.6% compared to 20.6% in Clayton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.