Demographics details for Vaughn, MT vs Cedar park, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Vaughn, MT vs Cedar park, TX.
| Data | Vaughn | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 975 | 77,642 |
| Median Age | 39.4 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $45,000 | $118,903 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Vaughn vs Cedar park
- The population in Cedar park is higher at 77,642, compared to 975 in Vaughn.
- Residents in Vaughn have a higher median age of 39.4 years compared to 37.6 years in Cedar park.
- Cedar park has a higher median income of $118,903, compared to $45,000 in Vaughn.
- In Cedar park, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 33.0% in Vaughn.
- Vaughn has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Cedar park.
- The unemployment rate in Vaughn is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.6% in Cedar park.
Demographics
Demographics Vaughn vs Cedar park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Vaughn | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 80 | 55 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 12 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 10 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Vaughn vs Cedar park
- In Cedar park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Vaughn.
- Vaughn has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 55% in Cedar park.
- In Cedar park, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 0% in Vaughn.
- Cedar park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 5% in Vaughn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Vaughn at 12% compared to 10% in Cedar park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Vaughn at 3% compared to 0% in Cedar park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Vaughn | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 18.7% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.2% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 31.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Vaughn vs Cedar park
- More residents in Vaughn report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 14.9% in Cedar park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar park at 24.1% versus 23.6% in Vaughn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Vaughn at 18.7% compared to 11.0% in Cedar park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Vaughn at 23.2% compared to 17.9% in Cedar park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Vaughn at 35.1% compared to 31.0% in Cedar park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Vaughn at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Cedar park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Vaughn | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (287) |
| High School Diploma | 28.3% (276) | 8.9% (6,896) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (39) | 4.1% (3,156) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.1% (89) | 35.8% (27,785) |
Education Levels Comparison: Vaughn vs Cedar park
- In Cedar park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Vaughn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Vaughn hold a high school diploma at 28.3% compared to 8.9% in Cedar park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cedar park at 4.1%, compared to 4.0% in Vaughn.
- In Cedar park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 9.1% in Vaughn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.