Demographics details for Vass, NC vs Kaysville, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Vass, NC vs Kaysville, UT.
Data | Vass | Kaysville |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,002 | 32,761 |
Median Age | 29.0 years | 32.1 years |
Median Income | $59,375 | $121,867 |
Married Families | 46.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Vass vs Kaysville
- The population in Kaysville is higher at 32,761, compared to 1,002 in Vass.
- The median age in Kaysville is higher at 32.1 years, compared to 29.0 years in Vass.
- Kaysville has a higher median income of $121,867, compared to $59,375 in Vass.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Vass at 46.0% compared to 45.0% in Kaysville.
- Vass has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 0% in Kaysville.
- Kaysville has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.2% in Vass.
Demographics
Demographics Vass vs Kaysville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Vass | Kaysville |
---|---|---|
Black | 33 | Data is updating |
White | 30 | 88 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 6 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 30 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Vass vs Kaysville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Vass at 33% compared to 0% in Kaysville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kaysville at 88% compared to 30% in Vass.
- Both Vass and Kaysville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Vass at 6% compared to 5% in Kaysville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Vass at 30% compared to 6% in Kaysville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Vass and Kaysville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Vass | Kaysville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 14.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 8.7% |
Depression | 23.5% | 23.7% |
Smoking | 14.6% | 6.7% |
Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 11.4% |
Obesity | 33.1% | 31.6% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Vass vs Kaysville
- More residents in Vass report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 14.8% in Kaysville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kaysville at 23.7% versus 23.5% in Vass.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Vass at 14.6% compared to 6.7% in Kaysville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Vass at 19.2% compared to 11.4% in Kaysville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Vass at 33.1% compared to 31.6% in Kaysville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Vass at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Kaysville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Vass | Kaysville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (9) | 0.4% (141) |
High School Diploma | 8.6% (86) | 6.1% (1,986) |
Less than High School | 11.5% (115) | 2.6% (859) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (162) | 28.5% (9,340) |
Education Levels Comparison: Vass vs Kaysville
- A higher percentage of residents in Vass have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Kaysville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Vass hold a high school diploma at 8.6% compared to 6.1% in Kaysville.
- More residents in Vass have less than a high school education at 11.5% compared to 2.6% in Kaysville.
- In Kaysville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 16.2% in Vass.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.