Demographics details for Vancouver, WA vs Lavallette, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Vancouver, WA vs Lavallette, NJ.
Data | Vancouver | Lavallette |
---|---|---|
Population | 194,512 | 1,838 |
Median Age | 37.4 years | 61.5 years |
Median Income | $73,626 | $108,750 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 56.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Vancouver vs Lavallette
- In Vancouver, the population is higher at 194,512, compared to 1,838 in Lavallette.
- The median age in Lavallette is higher at 61.5 years, compared to 37.4 years in Vancouver.
- Lavallette has a higher median income of $108,750, compared to $73,626 in Vancouver.
- In Lavallette, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 36.0% in Vancouver.
- Vancouver has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Lavallette.
- The unemployment rate in Vancouver is higher at 4.6%, compared to 4.2% in Lavallette.
Demographics
Demographics Vancouver vs Lavallette provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Vancouver | Lavallette |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | Data is updating |
White | 65 | 93 |
Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 15 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Vancouver vs Lavallette
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Vancouver at 3% compared to 0% in Lavallette.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lavallette at 93% compared to 65% in Vancouver.
- The Asian population is larger in Vancouver at 5% compared to 0% in Lavallette.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Vancouver at 15% compared to 2% in Lavallette.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Vancouver at 11% compared to 5% in Lavallette.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Vancouver at 1% compared to 0% in Lavallette.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Vancouver | Lavallette |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 14.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 9.2% |
Depression | 25.7% | 22.3% |
Smoking | 14.5% | 11.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 18.4% |
Obesity | 33.1% | 29.6% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Vancouver vs Lavallette
- More residents in Vancouver report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 14.4% in Lavallette.
- Depression is more prevalent in Vancouver at 25.7% compared to 22.3% in Lavallette.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Vancouver at 14.5% compared to 11.3% in Lavallette.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lavallette at 18.4% compared to 17.7% in Vancouver.
- Obesity rates are higher in Vancouver at 33.1% compared to 29.6% in Lavallette.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lavallette at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Vancouver.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Vancouver | Lavallette |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (1,478) | 0.4% (8) |
High School Diploma | 13.9% (26,995) | 18.7% (343) |
Less than High School | 10.7% (20,890) | 3.4% (63) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (41,308) | 50.1% (921) |
Education Levels Comparison: Vancouver vs Lavallette
- A higher percentage of residents in Vancouver have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Lavallette.
- In Lavallette, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.7% compared to 13.9% in Vancouver.
- More residents in Vancouver have less than a high school education at 10.7% compared to 3.4% in Lavallette.
- In Lavallette, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.1% compared to 21.2% in Vancouver.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.