Demographics details for Vancouver, WA vs Fairfield, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Vancouver, WA vs Fairfield, CT.
Data | Vancouver | Fairfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 194,512 | 62,105 |
Median Age | 37.4 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $73,626 | $102,000 |
Married Families | 36.0% | Data is updating |
Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Vancouver vs Fairfield
- In Vancouver, the population is higher at 194,512, compared to 62,105 in Fairfield.
- The median age in Fairfield is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 37.4 years in Vancouver.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $102,000, compared to $73,626 in Vancouver.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Vancouver at 36.0% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- Vancouver has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Fairfield.
- The unemployment rate in Vancouver is higher at 4.6%, compared to 2.9% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Vancouver vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Vancouver | Fairfield |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 5 |
White | 65 | 80 |
Asian | 5 | 7 |
Hispanic | 15 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 11 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Vancouver vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Vancouver.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairfield at 80% compared to 65% in Vancouver.
- In Fairfield, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 5% in Vancouver.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Vancouver at 15% compared to 8% in Fairfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Vancouver at 11% compared to 0% in Fairfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Vancouver at 1% compared to 0% in Fairfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Vancouver | Fairfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 25.7% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 14.5% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 17.7% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 33.1% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Vancouver vs Fairfield
- More residents in Vancouver report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Vancouver at 25.7% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Vancouver at 14.5% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Vancouver at 17.7% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Vancouver at 33.1% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Vancouver at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Vancouver | Fairfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (1,478) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 13.9% (26,995) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 10.7% (20,890) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (41,308) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Vancouver vs Fairfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Vancouver have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Vancouver hold a high school diploma at 13.9% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- More residents in Vancouver have less than a high school education at 10.7% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Vancouver hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.