Demographics details for Vancouver, WA vs Cleburne, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Vancouver, WA vs Cleburne, TX.
| Data | Vancouver | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 194,512 | 33,826 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 35.2 years |
| Median Income | $73,626 | $60,929 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Vancouver vs Cleburne
- In Vancouver, the population is higher at 194,512, compared to 33,826 in Cleburne.
- Residents in Vancouver have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 35.2 years in Cleburne.
- Vancouver has a higher median income of $73,626 compared to $60,929 in Cleburne.
- In Cleburne, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 36.0% in Vancouver.
- The poverty level is higher in Cleburne at 11%, compared to 10% in Vancouver.
- The unemployment rate in Vancouver is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.9% in Cleburne.
Demographics
Demographics Vancouver vs Cleburne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Vancouver | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 6 |
| White | 65 | 52 |
| Asian | 5 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Vancouver vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 3% in Vancouver.
- Vancouver has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 52% in Cleburne.
- The Asian population is larger in Vancouver at 5% compared to 1% in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 15% in Vancouver.
- Both Vancouver and Cleburne have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 11%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Vancouver and Cleburne at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Vancouver | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 14.5% | 20.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 33.1% | 37.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Vancouver vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 17.5% in Vancouver.
- Depression is more prevalent in Vancouver at 25.7% compared to 23.6% in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 14.5% in Vancouver.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cleburne at 17.9% compared to 17.7% in Vancouver.
- Cleburne has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 33.1% in Vancouver.
- Disability percentages are higher in Vancouver at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Cleburne.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Vancouver | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (1,478) | 1.4% (471) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (26,995) | 17.8% (6,005) |
| Less than High School | 10.7% (20,890) | 17.8% (6,010) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (41,308) | 10.0% (3,384) |
Education Levels Comparison: Vancouver vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.8% in Vancouver.
- In Cleburne, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 13.9% in Vancouver.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cleburne at 17.8%, compared to 10.7% in Vancouver.
- A higher percentage of residents in Vancouver hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 10.0% in Cleburne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.