Demographics details for Vancouver, WA vs Central falls, RI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Vancouver, WA vs Central falls, RI.

Data Vancouver Central falls
Population 194,512 22,490
Median Age 37.4 years 31.5 years
Median Income $73,626 $43,092
Married Families 36.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 10% 20%
Unemployment Rate 4.6 5.3

Population Comparison: Vancouver vs Central falls

  • In Vancouver, the population is higher at 194,512, compared to 22,490 in Central falls.
  • Residents in Vancouver have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 31.5 years in Central falls.
  • Vancouver has a higher median income of $73,626 compared to $43,092 in Central falls.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Vancouver at 36.0% compared to 29.0% in Central falls.
  • The poverty level is higher in Central falls at 20%, compared to 10% in Vancouver.
  • Central falls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 4.6% in Vancouver.

Demographics

Demographics Vancouver vs Central falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Vancouver Central falls
Black 3 8
White 65 4
Asian 5 Data is updating
Hispanic 15 69
Two or More Races 11 18
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Vancouver vs Central falls

  • In Central falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 3% in Vancouver.
  • Vancouver has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 4% in Central falls.
  • The Asian population is larger in Vancouver at 5% compared to 0% in Central falls.
  • Central falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 69%, compared to 15% in Vancouver.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central falls at 18%, compared to 11% in Vancouver.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Vancouver and Central falls at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Vancouver Central falls
Mental Health Not Good 17.5% 19.8%
Physical Health Not Good 11.5% 17.4%
Depression 25.7% 26.7%
Smoking 14.5% 22.8%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 14.2%
Obesity 33.1% 40.6%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Vancouver vs Central falls

  • In Central falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 17.5% in Vancouver.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Central falls at 26.7% versus 25.7% in Vancouver.
  • Central falls has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 14.5% in Vancouver.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Vancouver at 17.7% compared to 14.2% in Central falls.
  • Central falls has higher obesity rates at 40.6% compared to 33.1% in Vancouver.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central falls at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Vancouver.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Vancouver Central falls
No Schooling 0.8% (1,478) 4.7% (1,048)
High School Diploma 13.9% (26,995) 15.1% (3,406)
Less than High School 10.7% (20,890) 44.1% (9,911)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.2% (41,308) 5.6% (1,270)

Education Levels Comparison: Vancouver vs Central falls

  • In Central falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.7% compared to 0.8% in Vancouver.
  • In Central falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.1% compared to 13.9% in Vancouver.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central falls at 44.1%, compared to 10.7% in Vancouver.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Vancouver hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 5.6% in Central falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.