Demographics details for Vancleave, MS vs Stockholm, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Vancleave, MS vs Stockholm, WI.
Data | Vancleave | Stockholm |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,207 | 82 |
Median Age | 37.7 years | 69.8 years |
Median Income | $72,576 | $62,500 |
Married Families | 51.0% | 84.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Vancleave vs Stockholm
- In Vancleave, the population is higher at 5,207, compared to 82 in Stockholm.
- The median age in Stockholm is higher at 69.8 years, compared to 37.7 years in Vancleave.
- Vancleave has a higher median income of $72,576 compared to $62,500 in Stockholm.
- In Stockholm, the percentage of married families is higher at 84.0%, compared to 51.0% in Vancleave.
- Vancleave has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
- The unemployment rate in Vancleave is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.5% in Stockholm.
Demographics
Demographics Vancleave vs Stockholm provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Vancleave | Stockholm |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | Data is updating |
White | 92 | 100 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 2 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Vancleave vs Stockholm
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Vancleave at 5% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Stockholm at 100% compared to 92% in Vancleave.
- Both Vancleave and Stockholm have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Vancleave at 1% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Vancleave at 2% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Vancleave and Stockholm at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Vancleave | Stockholm |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 11.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 12.6% |
Depression | 23.7% | 20.6% |
Smoking | 17.6% | 16.4% |
Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 19.3% |
Obesity | 33.0% | 38.6% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Vancleave vs Stockholm
- More residents in Vancleave report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 11.8% in Stockholm.
- Depression is more prevalent in Vancleave at 23.7% compared to 20.6% in Stockholm.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Vancleave at 17.6% compared to 16.4% in Stockholm.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Stockholm at 19.3% compared to 17.1% in Vancleave.
- Stockholm has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 33.0% in Vancleave.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stockholm at 26.0% compared to 11.0% in Vancleave.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Vancleave | Stockholm |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (67) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 14.7% (765) | 28.0% (23) |
Less than High School | 8.5% (445) | 2.4% (2) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.0% (884) | 64.6% (53) |
Education Levels Comparison: Vancleave vs Stockholm
- A higher percentage of residents in Vancleave have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Stockholm.
- In Stockholm, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.0% compared to 14.7% in Vancleave.
- More residents in Vancleave have less than a high school education at 8.5% compared to 2.4% in Stockholm.
- In Stockholm, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 64.6% compared to 17.0% in Vancleave.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.