Demographics details for Vancleave, MS vs Loves park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Vancleave, MS vs Loves park, IL.
Data | Vancleave | Loves park |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,207 | 23,365 |
Median Age | 37.7 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $72,576 | $56,370 |
Married Families | 51.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Vancleave vs Loves park
- The population in Loves park is higher at 23,365, compared to 5,207 in Vancleave.
- Residents in Vancleave have a higher median age of 37.7 years compared to 36.6 years in Loves park.
- Vancleave has a higher median income of $72,576 compared to $56,370 in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Vancleave at 51.0% compared to 35.0% in Loves park.
- Vancleave has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Loves park.
- Loves park has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Vancleave.
Demographics
Demographics Vancleave vs Loves park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Vancleave | Loves park |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 7 |
White | 92 | 71 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 1 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Vancleave vs Loves park
- In Loves park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 5% in Vancleave.
- Vancleave has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 71% in Loves park.
- In Loves park, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Vancleave.
- Loves park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 1% in Vancleave.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 2% in Vancleave.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Vancleave and Loves park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Vancleave | Loves park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 16.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 11.3% |
Depression | 23.7% | 21.3% |
Smoking | 17.6% | 17.0% |
Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 33.0% | 39.4% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Vancleave vs Loves park
- In Loves park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 16.2% in Vancleave.
- Depression is more prevalent in Vancleave at 23.7% compared to 21.3% in Loves park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Vancleave at 17.6% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Vancleave at 17.1% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- Loves park has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 33.0% in Vancleave.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Loves park at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Vancleave.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Vancleave | Loves park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (67) | 0.4% (97) |
High School Diploma | 14.7% (765) | 17.1% (3,994) |
Less than High School | 8.5% (445) | 9.7% (2,262) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.0% (884) | 17.4% (4,064) |
Education Levels Comparison: Vancleave vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of residents in Vancleave have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.4% in Loves park.
- In Loves park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 14.7% in Vancleave.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Loves park at 9.7%, compared to 8.5% in Vancleave.
- In Loves park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 17.0% in Vancleave.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.