Demographics details for Vancleave, MS vs Farmington, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Vancleave, MS vs Farmington, WV.
Data | Vancleave | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,207 | 397 |
Median Age | 37.7 years | 37.1 years |
Median Income | $72,576 | $54,750 |
Married Families | 51.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Vancleave vs Farmington
- In Vancleave, the population is higher at 5,207, compared to 397 in Farmington.
- Residents in Vancleave have a higher median age of 37.7 years compared to 37.1 years in Farmington.
- Vancleave has a higher median income of $72,576 compared to $54,750 in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Vancleave at 51.0% compared to 44.0% in Farmington.
- Vancleave has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Vancleave.
Demographics
Demographics Vancleave vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Vancleave | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | Data is updating |
White | 92 | 100 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 2 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Vancleave vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Vancleave at 5% compared to 0% in Farmington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmington at 100% compared to 92% in Vancleave.
- Both Vancleave and Farmington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Vancleave at 1% compared to 0% in Farmington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Vancleave at 2% compared to 0% in Farmington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Vancleave and Farmington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Vancleave | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 20.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 14.8% |
Depression | 23.7% | 28.3% |
Smoking | 17.6% | 24.2% |
Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 14.9% |
Obesity | 33.0% | 39.5% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Vancleave vs Farmington
- In Farmington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.6% compared to 16.2% in Vancleave.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Farmington at 28.3% versus 23.7% in Vancleave.
- Farmington has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 17.6% in Vancleave.
- Binge drinking is more common in Vancleave at 17.1% compared to 14.9% in Farmington.
- Farmington has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 33.0% in Vancleave.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Farmington at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Vancleave.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Vancleave | Farmington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (67) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 14.7% (765) | 31.5% (125) |
Less than High School | 8.5% (445) | 8.1% (32) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.0% (884) | 9.8% (39) |
Education Levels Comparison: Vancleave vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of residents in Vancleave have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- In Farmington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.5% compared to 14.7% in Vancleave.
- More residents in Vancleave have less than a high school education at 8.5% compared to 8.1% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Vancleave hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 9.8% in Farmington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.