Demographics details for Vancleave, MS vs Farmington, WV

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Vancleave, MS vs Farmington, WV.

Data Vancleave Farmington
Population 5,207 397
Median Age 37.7 years 37.1 years
Median Income $72,576 $54,750
Married Families 51.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 13% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.0

Population Comparison: Vancleave vs Farmington

  • In Vancleave, the population is higher at 5,207, compared to 397 in Farmington.
  • Residents in Vancleave have a higher median age of 37.7 years compared to 37.1 years in Farmington.
  • Vancleave has a higher median income of $72,576 compared to $54,750 in Farmington.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Vancleave at 51.0% compared to 44.0% in Farmington.
  • Vancleave has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Farmington.
  • Farmington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Vancleave.

Demographics

Demographics Vancleave vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Vancleave Farmington
Black 5 Data is updating
White 92 100
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 1 Data is updating
Two or More Races 2 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Vancleave vs Farmington

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Vancleave at 5% compared to 0% in Farmington.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmington at 100% compared to 92% in Vancleave.
  • Both Vancleave and Farmington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Vancleave at 1% compared to 0% in Farmington.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Vancleave at 2% compared to 0% in Farmington.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Vancleave and Farmington at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Vancleave Farmington
Mental Health Not Good 16.2% 20.6%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 14.8%
Depression 23.7% 28.3%
Smoking 17.6% 24.2%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 14.9%
Obesity 33.0% 39.5%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Vancleave vs Farmington

  • In Farmington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.6% compared to 16.2% in Vancleave.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Farmington at 28.3% versus 23.7% in Vancleave.
  • Farmington has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 17.6% in Vancleave.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Vancleave at 17.1% compared to 14.9% in Farmington.
  • Farmington has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 33.0% in Vancleave.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Farmington at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Vancleave.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Vancleave Farmington
No Schooling 1.3% (67) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 14.7% (765) 31.5% (125)
Less than High School 8.5% (445) 8.1% (32)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.0% (884) 9.8% (39)

Education Levels Comparison: Vancleave vs Farmington

  • A higher percentage of residents in Vancleave have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
  • In Farmington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.5% compared to 14.7% in Vancleave.
  • More residents in Vancleave have less than a high school education at 8.5% compared to 8.1% in Farmington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Vancleave hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 9.8% in Farmington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.