Demographics details for Vancleave, MS vs Fair oaks, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Vancleave, MS vs Fair oaks, CA.
| Data | Vancleave | Fair oaks |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,207 | 32,754 |
| Median Age | 37.7 years | 45.7 years |
| Median Income | $72,576 | $112,138 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Vancleave vs Fair oaks
- The population in Fair oaks is higher at 32,754, compared to 5,207 in Vancleave.
- The median age in Fair oaks is higher at 45.7 years, compared to 37.7 years in Vancleave.
- Fair oaks has a higher median income of $112,138, compared to $72,576 in Vancleave.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Vancleave at 51.0% compared to 45.0% in Fair oaks.
- Vancleave has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 6% in Fair oaks.
- Fair oaks has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Vancleave.
Demographics
Demographics Vancleave vs Fair oaks provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Vancleave | Fair oaks |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 2 |
| White | 92 | 68 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Vancleave vs Fair oaks
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Vancleave at 5% compared to 2% in Fair oaks.
- Vancleave has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 68% in Fair oaks.
- In Fair oaks, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Vancleave.
- Fair oaks has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 1% in Vancleave.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fair oaks at 10%, compared to 2% in Vancleave.
- In Fair oaks, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Vancleave.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Vancleave | Fair oaks |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 9.3% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 20.3% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 10.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 33.0% | 29.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Vancleave vs Fair oaks
- More residents in Vancleave report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 15.6% in Fair oaks.
- Depression is more prevalent in Vancleave at 23.7% compared to 20.3% in Fair oaks.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Vancleave at 17.6% compared to 10.6% in Fair oaks.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fair oaks at 17.8% compared to 17.1% in Vancleave.
- Obesity rates are higher in Vancleave at 33.0% compared to 29.9% in Fair oaks.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Vancleave and Fair oaks at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Vancleave | Fair oaks |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (67) | 1.0% (312) |
| High School Diploma | 14.7% (765) | 9.5% (3,112) |
| Less than High School | 8.5% (445) | 4.9% (1,601) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.0% (884) | 35.4% (11,579) |
Education Levels Comparison: Vancleave vs Fair oaks
- A higher percentage of residents in Vancleave have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.0% in Fair oaks.
- A higher percentage of residents in Vancleave hold a high school diploma at 14.7% compared to 9.5% in Fair oaks.
- More residents in Vancleave have less than a high school education at 8.5% compared to 4.9% in Fair oaks.
- In Fair oaks, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.4% compared to 17.0% in Vancleave.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.