Demographics details for Valley, AL vs Fort atkinson, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Valley, AL vs Fort atkinson, WI.
Data | Valley | Fort atkinson |
---|---|---|
Population | 10,323 | 12,412 |
Median Age | 32.5 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $54,237 | $72,215 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Valley vs Fort atkinson
- The population in Fort atkinson is higher at 12,412, compared to 10,323 in Valley.
- The median age in Fort atkinson is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 32.5 years in Valley.
- Fort atkinson has a higher median income of $72,215, compared to $54,237 in Valley.
- In Fort atkinson, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 30.0% in Valley.
- Valley has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 9% in Fort atkinson.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Valley and Fort atkinson at 3.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Valley vs Fort atkinson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Valley | Fort atkinson |
---|---|---|
Black | 39 | Data is updating |
White | 56 | 89 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Valley vs Fort atkinson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Valley at 39% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort atkinson at 89% compared to 56% in Valley.
- Both Valley and Fort atkinson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Fort atkinson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 3% in Valley.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort atkinson at 3%, compared to 2% in Valley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Valley and Fort atkinson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Valley | Fort atkinson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 15.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 10.2% |
Depression | 23.5% | 23.6% |
Smoking | 20.1% | 16.0% |
Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 23.5% |
Obesity | 42.9% | 34.0% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Valley vs Fort atkinson
- More residents in Valley report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 15.2% in Fort atkinson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort atkinson at 23.6% versus 23.5% in Valley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Valley at 20.1% compared to 16.0% in Fort atkinson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 14.3% in Valley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Valley at 42.9% compared to 34.0% in Fort atkinson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Valley at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort atkinson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Valley | Fort atkinson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.4% (252) | 1.3% (160) |
High School Diploma | 22.3% (2,302) | 20.8% (2,578) |
Less than High School | 14.2% (1,467) | 12.9% (1,595) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (956) | 19.6% (2,436) |
Education Levels Comparison: Valley vs Fort atkinson
- A higher percentage of residents in Valley have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.3% in Fort atkinson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Valley hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 20.8% in Fort atkinson.
- More residents in Valley have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 12.9% in Fort atkinson.
- In Fort atkinson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 9.3% in Valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.