Demographics details for Valdosta, GA vs Tuscaloosa, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Valdosta, GA vs Tuscaloosa, AL.
| Data | Valdosta | Tuscaloosa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 55,074 | 110,602 |
| Median Age | 29.2 years | 28.8 years |
| Median Income | $41,365 | $47,257 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Valdosta vs Tuscaloosa
- The population in Tuscaloosa is higher at 110,602, compared to 55,074 in Valdosta.
- Residents in Valdosta have a higher median age of 29.2 years compared to 28.8 years in Tuscaloosa.
- Tuscaloosa has a higher median income of $47,257, compared to $41,365 in Valdosta.
- In Tuscaloosa, the percentage of married families is higher at 26.0%, compared to 25.0% in Valdosta.
- The poverty level is higher in Tuscaloosa at 21%, compared to 19% in Valdosta.
- The unemployment rate in Valdosta is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Tuscaloosa.
Demographics
Demographics Valdosta vs Tuscaloosa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Valdosta | Tuscaloosa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 56 | 41 |
| White | 34 | 49 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Valdosta vs Tuscaloosa
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Valdosta at 56% compared to 41% in Tuscaloosa.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Tuscaloosa at 49% compared to 34% in Valdosta.
- In Tuscaloosa, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Valdosta.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Valdosta at 5% compared to 4% in Tuscaloosa.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Valdosta at 4% compared to 3% in Tuscaloosa.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Valdosta and Tuscaloosa at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Valdosta | Tuscaloosa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.4% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 21.9% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 19.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.0% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 43.5% | 44.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Valdosta vs Tuscaloosa
- More residents in Valdosta report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 19.5% in Tuscaloosa.
- Depression is more prevalent in Valdosta at 22.2% compared to 21.9% in Tuscaloosa.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Valdosta at 23.1% compared to 19.6% in Tuscaloosa.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Tuscaloosa at 14.4% compared to 13.0% in Valdosta.
- Tuscaloosa has higher obesity rates at 44.5% compared to 43.5% in Valdosta.
- Disability percentages are higher in Valdosta at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Tuscaloosa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Valdosta | Tuscaloosa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (538) | 0.7% (721) |
| High School Diploma | 16.3% (8,967) | 12.5% (13,878) |
| Less than High School | 8.9% (4,906) | 6.1% (6,781) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.9% (8,750) | 20.3% (22,425) |
Education Levels Comparison: Valdosta vs Tuscaloosa
- A higher percentage of residents in Valdosta have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.7% in Tuscaloosa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Valdosta hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 12.5% in Tuscaloosa.
- More residents in Valdosta have less than a high school education at 8.9% compared to 6.1% in Tuscaloosa.
- In Tuscaloosa, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.3% compared to 15.9% in Valdosta.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.