Demographics details for Valdosta, GA vs Santa fe springs, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Valdosta, GA vs Santa fe springs, CA.
| Data | Valdosta | Santa fe springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 55,074 | 18,439 |
| Median Age | 29.2 years | 38.0 years |
| Median Income | $41,365 | $81,500 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Valdosta vs Santa fe springs
- In Valdosta, the population is higher at 55,074, compared to 18,439 in Santa fe springs.
- The median age in Santa fe springs is higher at 38.0 years, compared to 29.2 years in Valdosta.
- Santa fe springs has a higher median income of $81,500, compared to $41,365 in Valdosta.
- In Santa fe springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 25.0% in Valdosta.
- Valdosta has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 10% in Santa fe springs.
- Santa fe springs has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 5.1% in Valdosta.
Demographics
Demographics Valdosta vs Santa fe springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Valdosta | Santa fe springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 56 | 4 |
| White | 34 | -5 |
| Asian | 1 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 75 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Valdosta vs Santa fe springs
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Valdosta at 56% compared to 4% in Santa fe springs.
- Valdosta has a higher percentage of White residents at 34% compared to -5% in Santa fe springs.
- In Santa fe springs, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 1% in Valdosta.
- Santa fe springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 5% in Valdosta.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Santa fe springs at 15%, compared to 4% in Valdosta.
- In Santa fe springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Valdosta.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Valdosta | Santa fe springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.4% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 15.1% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 10.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.0% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 43.5% | 30.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Valdosta vs Santa fe springs
- More residents in Valdosta report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 14.9% in Santa fe springs.
- Depression is more prevalent in Valdosta at 22.2% compared to 15.1% in Santa fe springs.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Valdosta at 23.1% compared to 10.0% in Santa fe springs.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Santa fe springs at 15.7% compared to 13.0% in Valdosta.
- Obesity rates are higher in Valdosta at 43.5% compared to 30.9% in Santa fe springs.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Valdosta and Santa fe springs at 10.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Valdosta | Santa fe springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (538) | 3.5% (644) |
| High School Diploma | 16.3% (8,967) | 16.3% (3,011) |
| Less than High School | 8.9% (4,906) | 26.5% (4,883) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.9% (8,750) | 15.5% (2,850) |
Education Levels Comparison: Valdosta vs Santa fe springs
- In Santa fe springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 1.0% in Valdosta.
- Both cities have the same percentage of residents with high school diplomas at 16.3%.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Santa fe springs at 26.5%, compared to 8.9% in Valdosta.
- A higher percentage of residents in Valdosta hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.9% compared to 15.5% in Santa fe springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.