Demographics details for Valdosta, GA vs Hanover, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Valdosta, GA vs Hanover, MI.
| Data | Valdosta | Hanover |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 55,074 | 474 |
| Median Age | 29.2 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $41,365 | $65,250 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Valdosta vs Hanover
- In Valdosta, the population is higher at 55,074, compared to 474 in Hanover.
- The median age in Hanover is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 29.2 years in Valdosta.
- Hanover has a higher median income of $65,250, compared to $41,365 in Valdosta.
- In Hanover, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 25.0% in Valdosta.
- Valdosta has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 10% in Hanover.
- The unemployment rate in Valdosta is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Hanover.
Demographics
Demographics Valdosta vs Hanover provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Valdosta | Hanover |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 56 | 3 |
| White | 34 | 89 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Valdosta vs Hanover
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Valdosta at 56% compared to 3% in Hanover.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hanover at 89% compared to 34% in Valdosta.
- The Asian population is larger in Valdosta at 1% compared to 0% in Hanover.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Valdosta at 5% compared to 3% in Hanover.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hanover at 5%, compared to 4% in Valdosta.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Valdosta and Hanover at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Valdosta | Hanover |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.4% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 25.8% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.0% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 43.5% | 34.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Valdosta vs Hanover
- More residents in Valdosta report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 17.7% in Hanover.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hanover at 25.8% versus 22.2% in Valdosta.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Valdosta at 23.1% compared to 18.5% in Hanover.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hanover at 17.9% compared to 13.0% in Valdosta.
- Obesity rates are higher in Valdosta at 43.5% compared to 34.2% in Hanover.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hanover at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Valdosta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Valdosta | Hanover |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (538) | 0.4% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 16.3% (8,967) | 29.5% (140) |
| Less than High School | 8.9% (4,906) | 2.7% (13) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.9% (8,750) | 6.1% (29) |
Education Levels Comparison: Valdosta vs Hanover
- A higher percentage of residents in Valdosta have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Hanover.
- In Hanover, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.5% compared to 16.3% in Valdosta.
- More residents in Valdosta have less than a high school education at 8.9% compared to 2.7% in Hanover.
- A higher percentage of residents in Valdosta hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.9% compared to 6.1% in Hanover.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.