Demographics details for Valdosta, GA vs Broken arrow, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Valdosta, GA vs Broken arrow, OK.
Data | Valdosta | Broken arrow |
---|---|---|
Population | 55,074 | 117,911 |
Median Age | 29.2 years | 36.8 years |
Median Income | $41,365 | $82,547 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 19% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Valdosta vs Broken arrow
- The population in Broken arrow is higher at 117,911, compared to 55,074 in Valdosta.
- The median age in Broken arrow is higher at 36.8 years, compared to 29.2 years in Valdosta.
- Broken arrow has a higher median income of $82,547, compared to $41,365 in Valdosta.
- In Broken arrow, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 25.0% in Valdosta.
- Valdosta has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 10% in Broken arrow.
- The unemployment rate in Valdosta is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.3% in Broken arrow.
Demographics
Demographics Valdosta vs Broken arrow provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Valdosta | Broken arrow |
---|---|---|
Black | 56 | 5 |
White | 34 | 65 |
Asian | 1 | 4 |
Hispanic | 5 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Valdosta vs Broken arrow
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Valdosta at 56% compared to 5% in Broken arrow.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Broken arrow at 65% compared to 34% in Valdosta.
- In Broken arrow, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Valdosta.
- Broken arrow has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 5% in Valdosta.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Broken arrow at 11%, compared to 4% in Valdosta.
- In Broken arrow, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Valdosta.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Valdosta | Broken arrow |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 16.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.4% | 10.3% |
Depression | 22.2% | 25.0% |
Smoking | 23.1% | 14.9% |
Binge Drinking | 13.0% | 15.0% |
Obesity | 43.5% | 34.6% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Valdosta vs Broken arrow
- More residents in Valdosta report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 16.8% in Broken arrow.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Broken arrow at 25.0% versus 22.2% in Valdosta.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Valdosta at 23.1% compared to 14.9% in Broken arrow.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Broken arrow at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Valdosta.
- Obesity rates are higher in Valdosta at 43.5% compared to 34.6% in Broken arrow.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Broken arrow at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Valdosta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Valdosta | Broken arrow |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (538) | 0.8% (935) |
High School Diploma | 16.3% (8,967) | 13.2% (15,535) |
Less than High School | 8.9% (4,906) | 6.6% (7,783) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.9% (8,750) | 22.2% (26,196) |
Education Levels Comparison: Valdosta vs Broken arrow
- A higher percentage of residents in Valdosta have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Broken arrow.
- A higher percentage of residents in Valdosta hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 13.2% in Broken arrow.
- More residents in Valdosta have less than a high school education at 8.9% compared to 6.6% in Broken arrow.
- In Broken arrow, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.2% compared to 15.9% in Valdosta.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.