Demographics details for Vacaville, CA vs Fancy farm, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Vacaville, CA vs Fancy farm, KY.
| Data | Vacaville | Fancy farm |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 101,918 | 300 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 51.1 years |
| Median Income | $106,764 | $55,060 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Vacaville vs Fancy farm
- In Vacaville, the population is higher at 101,918, compared to 300 in Fancy farm.
- The median age in Fancy farm is higher at 51.1 years, compared to 37.3 years in Vacaville.
- Vacaville has a higher median income of $106,764 compared to $55,060 in Fancy farm.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Vacaville at 39.0% compared to 31.0% in Fancy farm.
- Vacaville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Fancy farm.
- The unemployment rate in Vacaville is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.2% in Fancy farm.
Demographics
Demographics Vacaville vs Fancy farm provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Vacaville | Fancy farm |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 3 |
| White | 43 | 91 |
| Asian | 10 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 26 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Vacaville vs Fancy farm
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Vacaville at 8% compared to 3% in Fancy farm.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fancy farm at 91% compared to 43% in Vacaville.
- The Asian population is larger in Vacaville at 10% compared to 0% in Fancy farm.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Vacaville at 26% compared to 0% in Fancy farm.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Vacaville at 12% compared to 6% in Fancy farm.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Vacaville at 1% compared to 0% in Fancy farm.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Vacaville | Fancy farm |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 18.9% | 27.3% |
| Smoking | 12.5% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 30.6% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Vacaville vs Fancy farm
- In Fancy farm, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.0% in Vacaville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fancy farm at 27.3% versus 18.9% in Vacaville.
- Fancy farm has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 12.5% in Vacaville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Vacaville at 17.9% compared to 16.7% in Fancy farm.
- Fancy farm has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 30.6% in Vacaville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fancy farm at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Vacaville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Vacaville | Fancy farm |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (813) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (13,656) | 47.7% (143) |
| Less than High School | 10.1% (10,246) | 5.3% (16) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.1% (18,492) | 14.3% (43) |
Education Levels Comparison: Vacaville vs Fancy farm
- A higher percentage of residents in Vacaville have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Fancy farm.
- In Fancy farm, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 47.7% compared to 13.4% in Vacaville.
- More residents in Vacaville have less than a high school education at 10.1% compared to 5.3% in Fancy farm.
- A higher percentage of residents in Vacaville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.1% compared to 14.3% in Fancy farm.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.