Demographics details for Ute, IA vs North richland hills, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Ute, IA vs North richland hills, TX.

Data Ute North richland hills
Population 329 70,663
Median Age 39.5 years 38.7 years
Median Income $51,250 $88,656
Married Families 27.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 9% 9%
Unemployment Rate 2.2 3.9

Population Comparison: Ute vs North richland hills

  • The population in North richland hills is higher at 70,663, compared to 329 in Ute.
  • Residents in Ute have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 38.7 years in North richland hills.
  • North richland hills has a higher median income of $88,656, compared to $51,250 in Ute.
  • In North richland hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 27.0% in Ute.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Ute and North richland hills at 9%.
  • North richland hills has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 2.2% in Ute.

Demographics

Demographics Ute vs North richland hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Ute North richland hills
Black Data is updating 6
White 99 59
Asian Data is updating 4
Hispanic 1 20
Two or More Races Data is updating 10
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Ute vs North richland hills

  • In North richland hills, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Ute.
  • Ute has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 59% in North richland hills.
  • In North richland hills, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Ute.
  • North richland hills has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 1% in Ute.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in North richland hills at 10%, compared to 0% in Ute.
  • In North richland hills, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Ute.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Ute North richland hills
Mental Health Not Good 16.3% 16.0%
Physical Health Not Good 10.1% 10.3%
Depression 19.9% 23.6%
Smoking 18.5% 14.1%
Binge Drinking 21.4% 18.4%
Obesity 40.5% 32.4%
Disability Percentage 24.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Ute vs North richland hills

  • More residents in Ute report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 16.0% in North richland hills.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in North richland hills at 23.6% versus 19.9% in Ute.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Ute at 18.5% compared to 14.1% in North richland hills.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Ute at 21.4% compared to 18.4% in North richland hills.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Ute at 40.5% compared to 32.4% in North richland hills.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Ute at 24.0% compared to 12.0% in North richland hills.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Ute North richland hills
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.9% (621)
High School Diploma 31.0% (102) 12.9% (9,109)
Less than High School 8.5% (28) 9.6% (6,756)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.0% (23) 24.5% (17,331)

Education Levels Comparison: Ute vs North richland hills

  • In North richland hills, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Ute.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Ute hold a high school diploma at 31.0% compared to 12.9% in North richland hills.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in North richland hills at 9.6%, compared to 8.5% in Ute.
  • In North richland hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.5% compared to 7.0% in Ute.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.