Environment details: Ute IA
Average quality, influenced by nearby farming practices.
Environment details: Kosciusko MS
Good quality, overall safe for consumption.
Compare Environment: Ute IA vs Kosciusko MS
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Ute | Kosciusko |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 585 | 504 |
| Water Quality | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Average quality, influenced by nearby farming practices. | Good quality, overall safe for consumption. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.72 | 1.55 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 29 | 20 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Ute vs Kosciusko
- The water quality in Kosciusko is superior at 7/10 compared to 5/10 in Ute.
- The median air quality index is lower (worse) in Ute at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Kosciusko.
- The average air quality index is worse in Ute with 1.72 compared to 1.55 in Kosciusko.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Ute at 29 compared to 20 in Kosciusko.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.