Demographics details for Ute, IA vs Burkesville, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ute, IA vs Burkesville, KY.
Data | Ute | Burkesville |
---|---|---|
Population | 329 | 1,380 |
Median Age | 39.5 years | 51.6 years |
Median Income | $51,250 | $26,563 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Ute vs Burkesville
- The population in Burkesville is higher at 1,380, compared to 329 in Ute.
- The median age in Burkesville is higher at 51.6 years, compared to 39.5 years in Ute.
- Ute has a higher median income of $51,250 compared to $26,563 in Burkesville.
- In Burkesville, the percentage of married families is higher at 29.0%, compared to 27.0% in Ute.
- The poverty level is higher in Burkesville at 14%, compared to 9% in Ute.
- Burkesville has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.2% in Ute.
Demographics
Demographics Ute vs Burkesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Ute | Burkesville |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 11 |
White | 99 | 83 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 1 | 3 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ute vs Burkesville
- In Burkesville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 0% in Ute.
- Ute has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 83% in Burkesville.
- In Burkesville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Ute.
- Burkesville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Ute.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Burkesville at 2%, compared to 0% in Ute.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ute and Burkesville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Ute | Burkesville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 21.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 16.8% |
Depression | 19.9% | 29.6% |
Smoking | 18.5% | 27.1% |
Binge Drinking | 21.4% | 13.7% |
Obesity | 40.5% | 43.9% |
Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ute vs Burkesville
- In Burkesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.8% compared to 16.3% in Ute.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Burkesville at 29.6% versus 19.9% in Ute.
- Burkesville has a higher smoking rate at 27.1% compared to 18.5% in Ute.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ute at 21.4% compared to 13.7% in Burkesville.
- Burkesville has higher obesity rates at 43.9% compared to 40.5% in Ute.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Burkesville at 28.0% compared to 24.0% in Ute.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Ute | Burkesville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (8) |
High School Diploma | 31.0% (102) | 32.7% (451) |
Less than High School | 8.5% (28) | 35.8% (494) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (23) | 5.2% (72) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ute vs Burkesville
- In Burkesville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Ute.
- In Burkesville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.7% compared to 31.0% in Ute.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Burkesville at 35.8%, compared to 8.5% in Ute.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ute hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.0% compared to 5.2% in Burkesville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.