Demographics details for Upland, CA vs Central city, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Upland, CA vs Central city, NE.
| Data | Upland | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 78,841 | 3,078 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $93,994 | $54,063 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Upland vs Central city
- In Upland, the population is higher at 78,841, compared to 3,078 in Central city.
- Residents in Upland have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 37.0 years in Central city.
- Upland has a higher median income of $93,994 compared to $54,063 in Central city.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Upland and Central city at 38.0%.
- The poverty level is identical in both Upland and Central city at 9%.
- The unemployment rate in Upland is higher at 4.4%, compared to 2.5% in Central city.
Demographics
Demographics Upland vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Upland | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | Data is updating |
| White | 22 | 86 |
| Asian | 10 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 44 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Upland vs Central city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Upland at 7% compared to 0% in Central city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Central city at 86% compared to 22% in Upland.
- The Asian population is larger in Upland at 10% compared to 3% in Central city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Upland at 44% compared to 7% in Central city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Upland at 16% compared to 4% in Central city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Upland at 1% compared to 0% in Central city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Upland | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 18.6% |
| Smoking | 10.8% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 20.0% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Upland vs Central city
- More residents in Upland report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 14.5% in Central city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central city at 18.6% versus 17.8% in Upland.
- Central city has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 10.8% in Upland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Central city at 20.0% compared to 16.3% in Upland.
- Central city has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 34.9% in Upland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central city at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Upland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Upland | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (1,036) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.1% (11,080) | 23.4% (721) |
| Less than High School | 12.3% (9,718) | 5.8% (178) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.2% (18,252) | 13.1% (404) |
Education Levels Comparison: Upland vs Central city
- A higher percentage of residents in Upland have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Central city.
- In Central city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.4% compared to 14.1% in Upland.
- More residents in Upland have less than a high school education at 12.3% compared to 5.8% in Central city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Upland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.2% compared to 13.1% in Central city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.