Demographics details for Uniontown, PA vs South gate, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Uniontown, PA vs South gate, CA.
Data | Uniontown | South gate |
---|---|---|
Population | 9,689 | 90,926 |
Median Age | 42.6 years | 33.7 years |
Median Income | $37,886 | $67,188 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 22% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.7 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Uniontown vs South gate
- The population in South gate is higher at 90,926, compared to 9,689 in Uniontown.
- Residents in Uniontown have a higher median age of 42.6 years compared to 33.7 years in South gate.
- South gate has a higher median income of $67,188, compared to $37,886 in Uniontown.
- In South gate, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 30.0% in Uniontown.
- Uniontown has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 18% in South gate.
- The unemployment rate in Uniontown is higher at 6.7%, compared to 6.1% in South gate.
Demographics
Demographics Uniontown vs South gate provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Uniontown | South gate |
---|---|---|
Black | 18 | 1 |
White | 74 | -21 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 1 | 97 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 21 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Uniontown vs South gate
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Uniontown at 18% compared to 1% in South gate.
- Uniontown has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to -21% in South gate.
- The Asian population is larger in Uniontown at 2% compared to 1% in South gate.
- South gate has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 97%, compared to 1% in Uniontown.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South gate at 21%, compared to 5% in Uniontown.
- In South gate, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Uniontown.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Uniontown | South gate |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.6% | 16.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.2% | 14.9% |
Depression | 25.6% | 16.3% |
Smoking | 26.3% | 12.7% |
Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 14.5% |
Obesity | 41.1% | 34.1% |
Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Uniontown vs South gate
- More residents in Uniontown report poor mental health at 20.6% compared to 16.8% in South gate.
- Depression is more prevalent in Uniontown at 25.6% compared to 16.3% in South gate.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Uniontown at 26.3% compared to 12.7% in South gate.
- Binge drinking is more common in Uniontown at 16.1% compared to 14.5% in South gate.
- Obesity rates are higher in Uniontown at 41.1% compared to 34.1% in South gate.
- Disability percentages are higher in Uniontown at 24.0% compared to 9.0% in South gate.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Uniontown | South gate |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (56) | 4.6% (4,160) |
High School Diploma | 28.6% (2,770) | 14.9% (13,536) |
Less than High School | 17.5% (1,695) | 53.3% (48,481) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.9% (1,440) | 7.5% (6,822) |
Education Levels Comparison: Uniontown vs South gate
- In South gate, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.6% compared to 0.6% in Uniontown.
- A higher percentage of residents in Uniontown hold a high school diploma at 28.6% compared to 14.9% in South gate.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South gate at 53.3%, compared to 17.5% in Uniontown.
- A higher percentage of residents in Uniontown hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 7.5% in South gate.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.