Demographics details for Union, OR vs Harrington park, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Union, OR vs Harrington park, NJ.

Data Union Harrington park
Population 26,177 4,954
Median Age 39.7 years 46.9 years
Median Income $61,946 $183,138
Married Families 42.0% 57.0%
Poverty Level 11% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.4

Population Comparison: Union vs Harrington park

  • In Union, the population is higher at 26,177, compared to 4,954 in Harrington park.
  • The median age in Harrington park is higher at 46.9 years, compared to 39.7 years in Union.
  • Harrington park has a higher median income of $183,138, compared to $61,946 in Union.
  • In Harrington park, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 42.0% in Union.
  • Union has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 0% in Harrington park.
  • The unemployment rate in Union is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.4% in Harrington park.

Demographics

Demographics Union vs Harrington park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Union Harrington park
Black 1 Data is updating
White 88 70
Asian 1 19
Hispanic 5 5
Two or More Races 4 6
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Union vs Harrington park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union at 1% compared to 0% in Harrington park.
  • Union has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 70% in Harrington park.
  • In Harrington park, the Asian population stands at 19%, greater than 1% in Union.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Union and Harrington park at 5%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Harrington park at 6%, compared to 4% in Union.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Union at 1% compared to 0% in Harrington park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Union Harrington park
Mental Health Not Good 18.5% 12.5%
Physical Health Not Good 11.6% 7.0%
Depression 27.8% 16.7%
Smoking 17.0% 9.6%
Binge Drinking 17.8% 17.5%
Obesity 35.4% 23.0%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Union vs Harrington park

  • More residents in Union report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 12.5% in Harrington park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Union at 27.8% compared to 16.7% in Harrington park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Union at 17.0% compared to 9.6% in Harrington park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Union at 17.8% compared to 17.5% in Harrington park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Union at 35.4% compared to 23.0% in Harrington park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Union at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Harrington park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Union Harrington park
No Schooling 0.6% (146) 0.2% (10)
High School Diploma 18.6% (4,878) 7.0% (345)
Less than High School 9.1% (2,380) 2.1% (105)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.0% (4,194) 47.3% (2,342)

Education Levels Comparison: Union vs Harrington park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Union have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Harrington park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Union hold a high school diploma at 18.6% compared to 7.0% in Harrington park.
  • More residents in Union have less than a high school education at 9.1% compared to 2.1% in Harrington park.
  • In Harrington park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.3% compared to 16.0% in Union.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.